Re: Re[2]: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

On Feb 18, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: \textbraceleft and \textbraceright should work ok if encodings are set up correctly. Your're right, it works as expected. Thanks a lot! All best Thomas ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

At 09:17 17/02/2004, Thomas A.Schmitz wrote: Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset "{" and "}". Suggestions were "\type|{| and \type|}|" or "$\{$ and $\}$". Neither of which is satisfactory, be

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Thomas A.Schmitz wrote: > Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question > was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset > "{" and "}". Suggestions were "\type|{| and \type|}|" or "$\{$ and > $\}$". Neither of which is sati

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

At 07:24 18/02/2004, you wrote: A couple of fonts, including Computer Modern Roman, do not have curly braces as glyphs. As Computer Modern Roman is the brick-and-mortar font of TeX, few people bother that there is no explicit token/command that evokes it. mayhe changing to LatinModern will help, si

RE: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

TG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so > many trees > > > Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think > the question > was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset > "{" and "}". Suggestions were "

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

A couple of fonts, including Computer Modern Roman, do not have curly braces as glyphs. As Computer Modern Roman is the brick-and-mortar font of TeX, few people bother that there is no explicit token/command that evokes it. You have a point though. -- Johannes Hüsing There is something fascin

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset "{" and "}". Suggestions were "\type|{| and \type|}|" or "$\{$ and $\}$". Neither of which is satisfactory, because it will typeset them either in typewri

RE: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

ginal Message- > From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so > many trees > > > Hello, > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:29:48PM +0100, A

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hello, On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:29:48PM +0100, Alexander Klink wrote: > > How do I print '{' and '}'. You may answer with RTFM but please name the M > > and page! > what about \type|{| and \type|}| (just like \verb in LaTeX)? Or $\{$ and $\}$ which uses the math font instead of the typewriter fr

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hi Dierk, On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 11:09:22AM +0100, "Höppner, Dierk" wrote: > just a short and simple question with hopefully a quick answer: > > How do I print '{' and '}'. You may answer with RTFM but please name the M > and page! what about \type|{| and \type|}| (just like \verb in LaTeX)? >

[NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hello, just a short and simple question with hopefully a quick answer: How do I print '{' and '}'. You may answer with RTFM but please name the M and page! Thanks and sorry for the simple question. greetings Dierk Höppner Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitätsbibliothek Hannover (TIB/U