On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
maybe there is already code for that, but I haven't found it: is it possible
to have itemgroups where every single item is within a frame (this is
something that may be interesting for presentations)? Just to give you an
idea of what I wa
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which
should be at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \setupframed.
Aditya
Oh, that's good, thanks Aditya! The baselines still don't quite agree,
but it'
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>>> The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be
>>> at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
>>
>> Add location=top to \setupframed.
>>
>> Aditya
>
> Oh
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be
at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \setupframed.
Aditya
Oh, that's good, thanks Aditya! T
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>>> The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be
>>> at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
>>
>> Add location=top to \setupframed.
>>
>> Aditya
>
> Oh
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV
you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax'
(not the best method but \localhsize is not available)
Wolfgang
Aditya, Wolfgang,
thanks a lot, I now
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be at
the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \se
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>>
> The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which
Am 16.11.2009 um 10:09 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>> If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV
>> you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax'
>> (not the best method but \localhsize is n
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of t
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz
wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>> If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV
>> you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax'
>> (not the best method but \localhsiz
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>>
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
>
>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I always thought that broad should use as much space as possible. So,
> anything more or less is a bug :)
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 20 *\recurselevel\relax
\framed[width=broad,align=middle]{ }
\blank
}
\stop
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I always thought that broad should use as much space as possible. So,
anything more or less is a bug :)
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 20 *\recurselevel\relax
\framed[wi
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
> itemize.
hmm I'm not sure to understand what you mean
What is wrong in this ?
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 20 *\recurselevel\relax
\fram
Am 16.11.2009 um 22:46 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
>> itemize.
> hmm I'm not sure to understand what you mean
> What is wrong in this ?
>
> \starttext
> \dorecurse{2
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
itemize.
hmm I'm not sure to understand what you mean
What is wrong in this ?
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
>>> itemize.
>>
>> hmm I'm not sure to understand what
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:20 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>> That is wrong behaviour.We should have B = C = A - itemgrouplistwidth.
>>
>> Otherwise, the frames inside the itemize environment exceed the total width.
-- Sorry wrong post --
\showframe
\starttext
\dorecurse{1}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \tex
Am 16.11.2009 um 23:31 schrieb luigi scarso:
> I'm ( still :-) )
> not sure that \hsize and \startitemize must play well together,
> I will give it a look.
That's why we have \localhsize but it's not working.
Wolfgang
___
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
> That's why we have \localhsize but it's not working.
yes, I was looking at \localhsize in the first post
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:42 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> That's why we have \localhsize but it's not working.
\showframe
\starttext
\dorecurse{1}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 1 *\recurselevel\relax
\framed[width=broad,align=midd
Am 16.11.2009 um 23:49 schrieb luigi scarso:
> \showframe
> \starttext
> \dorecurse{1}{%
> \hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 1 *\recurselevel\relax
> \framed[width=broad,align=middle]{\the\hsize}
> \bgroup
> \startitemize
> \advance\hsize -\itemgrouplistwidth\relax%
> \item
> \framed[width=broad,alig
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Am 16.11.2009 um 23:49 schrieb luigi scarso:
>
>> \showframe
>> \starttext
>> \dorecurse{1}{%
>> \hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 1 *\recurselevel\relax
>> \framed[width=broad,align=middle]{\the\hsize}
>> \bgroup
>> \startitemize
>> \advan
Am 17.11.2009 um 00:19 schrieb luigi scarso:
>> as you can see in the third item the width of the text (\input tufte)
>> is too narrow because of the reduced \hsize but this works
> yes too narrow,
> but with this still
> width=broad is not good,
> because broad should be now egual to \localhsiz
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
> from pack-rul:
>
> \else\ifx\localwidth\v!broad
> \boxhaswidthtrue
> \!!framedwidth\hsize
> \else\ifx\localwidth\v!local
> \boxhaswidthtrue
> \setlocalhsize
> \!!framedwidth\localhsize
>
> use \framed[width=local]
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> That's what I mean with not sure that \hsize and \startitemize must
> play well together
No, sorry, wrong phrase.
What I mean is that I already found that \startitemize and \framed with
width=broad was not ok, because broad is related to
Am 17.11.2009 um 09:12 schrieb luigi scarso:
> What I mean is that I already found that \startitemize and \framed with
> width=broad was not ok, because broad is related to \hsize but it's
> ok in other situations.
You can't use \hsize because it the width of the complete text area which
Te
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
from pack-rul:
\else\ifx\localwidth\v!broad
\boxhaswidthtrue
\!!framedwidth\hsize
\else\ifx\localwidth\v!local
\boxhaswidthtrue
\setlocalhsize
\!!framedwidth\localhsize
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I did not know about width=local (and therefore wanted width=broad to behave
> like it). Given that, I think that broad behaves just fine. These differnt
> options need to be documented better.
yes, in the wiki... where ?
--
luigi
___
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I did not know about width=local (and therefore wanted width=broad to behave
like it). Given that, I think that broad behaves just fine. These differnt
options need to be documented better.
yes, i
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
..
done at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Framed#Width_broad_and_local
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
32 matches
Mail list logo
