Is it recommended to kick off defrag's for VM's who are using shared storage
?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM, David Lum wrote:
> We use PerfectDisk here with uh...results. Inobtrusive, but no idea if it
> helps or not. I mean the servers stay defragged but that's about all I know
> :-)
>
> D
I'm getting the same crap. It's extremely annoying. Gmail decides now
to strip HTML bodies ?
On 12/3/09, Steven Peck wrote:
> I am using a web browser to read/send gmail. It will not go into my
> outlook.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:03 PM, David Lum wrote:
>> I hope I am joking, but the possi
I'm using forwarding to OpenDNS for quite sometime now with no complaints.
Their usage graphs are pretty, FWIW.
I believe the feature in win2k3 is called conditional forwarding, and that
works like a charm for several intermediate windows DNS boxes.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:50 PM, David W. McS
I have a similar requirement at one site. Everything is resolavble to
company.com, inside and out.
They use checkpoint Fw's. Rulebase additions from inside network to
outside nat'd address pasthru the firewall just fine. I enter static
DNS entries on the AD-INT zone and all works like a charm.
I
t; well and your dancing.
>
>
>
> Not had a problem doing it this way.
>
>
>
> *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 13 November 2009 15:10
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: P2V a DC
>
>
>
> When P2V'ing a DC -- w
When P2V'ing a DC -- what steps to do you take once the clone is up and
running to prevent any authentication crashes or issues in general ?
Obviously there has to be a computer name change, IP change. Newsid ?
Anything in the AD that needs to be ran/re-ran to pick up the cloned DC's ?
On Fri,
Doesn't seem like an issue with the R710, but if it is, please let me
know. I just ordered 2 of these bad boys for a vSphere install.
On 11/12/09, Peter Schwarz wrote:
> +1
>
> This happened to me once so I reset the permissions on C:\ manually. This
> got the box back up and running but ever sin
Whoa I guess this had to be their ultimate fate. I've been a rcom
switch user for quite sometime..
On 11/11/09, Andrew Levicki wrote:
> Wow!
>
> 2009/11/11 Webster
>
>> http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2009/09xa.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Webster
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powe
to provide *2* different OWA URLs. There are
> a lot of reason, which I'd rather not blather on about.
>
> Which is why I am wondering, if I build a CAS/HUB server, and a seperate
> Mailbox server, will I be able to achieve my goal?
>
>
>
> Original Message:
> -
This is all guess work here, but -- have you checked the binding order of
the teamed NIC ? Did you add the exemptions via netsh ?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> Perzactly... if I were to hazard a guess it has something to do with the
> teaming... Can you turn that off for a q
The recommend migration scenario for OWA users then would be something like
this:
https://webmail03.mydomain.com
https://webmail07.mydomain.com
Going to be tackling an 03 migration pretty soon...
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> and moving to a new namespace in 2007
His font (at least how gmail is delivering it) lead me to believe it was S0,
which is exactly why I found it to be pretty funny...
Anyways, please proceed...=)
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:43 AM, David Lum wrote:
> What does that have to do with VM’s?
>
>
>
> *From:* tony patton [mailto:tony.pa
S0? now that's an acronym worth remembering..lol.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:18 AM, tony patton <
tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> The SO already complains at the fact I have 13 vm's and 2 physicals at
> home.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Patton
> Desktop Operations Cavan
> Ext 8078
> Di
NParr -- Thanks. That config actually sounds pretty cost/energy efficient
and fully compatible.
Thanks again for sharing...
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, N Parr wrote:
> The drives aren't really as important as the controller. If you're
> building an ESX or Vsphere box from a workstation a
In my experience, Sonicwall's are absolutely terrible when going against any
fortinet or Juniper FW's. I'd rather do a netgate box with either monowall
or pfsense than choose a Sonicwall, IMO.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Mike Sullivan wrote:
> I also had the same experience back around th
+1
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:26 PM, wrote:
> Free - use your computer.
> Cheap - use your computer, a USB hub or five, and a script or free
> duplicator software.
>
> Also, check cyberguys.com. They usualy have these kind of things for a
> reasonable price.
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School Dis
27;m pretty sure it would be in vein.
Sure, send me your paypal address..unless of course you've found a
"free" linux alternative to paypal.
On 10/27/09, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Harry Singh wrote:
>> It's outbound load balancing
This is a great piece of information.
Thank You Ben..
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> Someone was asking VLAN questions, so I decided to re-post this.
> I've also updated it to reflect our successful VoIP deployment.
>
> PROTOCOL CONCEPTS
>
> We have regular "untagged" Eth
t the OP is requesting.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Harry Singh wrote:
> > www.elfiq.com
>
> Holy crap -- I just looked at the prices. You can do this with
> Linux and a 7 year old PC for "free". Sure, they&
I don't know much of anything about the products listed, but if you're open
to suggestion i would HIGHLY recommend ELFIQ.
www.elfiq.com
The product plainly works as advertised -- it's support team is very
knowledge and responsiveness and overall code design is very efficient.
On Mon, Oct 26,
For those that have the windows FW engage once the network is out of
network, how is that done ? Personally, we shut down the windows FW
and rely on reduced perms, app whitelists and randomizing pwd's...
But it would be nice to have the windows FW turn on for our road
warriors when they are home,c
80 Megs is fast, but VPN's are all about latency back to your HQ. I'd love
to know how many hops you are traversing back over to HQ and what your RTT
and packet loss look like...Nonteless, i'd be a torrent freak with 80
down..dam that's fast.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Leif Wahlberg wrote
Cacti technically, out of the box, won't allow you to see who is hogging up
all your bandwidth down to the NIC, but NTOP can.
Ntop is your friend.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Steven Peck wrote:
> I would say go with one of the Cacti virtual boxes that are
> pre-configured before you spend
201 - 223 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
