Sun, 22 May 2011 21:40:22 -0700
To: "oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>"
mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment
First, I'd like to add my support for Brian Eaton's comments on Draft 16.
They actually helped clarify the comment I
t-uri, would that suffice?
Regards
Mark
oauth-boun...@ietf.org wrote on 23/05/2011 05:40:22:
From:
Shane B Weeden
To:
oauth@ietf.org
Date:
23/05/2011 06:26
Subject:
[OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment
Sent by:
oauth-boun...@ietf.org
First, I'd like to add my support for Brian Eaton's
etect malicious clients (maleware, viruses).
regards,
Torsten.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mark Mcgloin [mailto:mark.mcgl...@ie.ibm.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 12:26
> An: Shane B Weeden
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org; oauth-boun...@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [OAU
#x27;s redirect-uri, would that suffice?
Regards
Mark
oauth-boun...@ietf.org wrote on 23/05/2011 05:40:22:
> From:
>
> Shane B Weeden
>
> To:
>
> oauth@ietf.org
>
> Date:
>
> 23/05/2011 06:26
>
> Subject:
>
> [OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment
>
> S
First, I'd like to add my support for Brian Eaton's comments on Draft 16.
They actually helped clarify the comment I have below
I found section 9 to be in contradiction to a part of section 6. In
particular in section 9:
Native applications SHOULD use the authorization code grant type flow
