Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

Hi. 2012/6/5 Jürgen Schmidt : > If possible I would prefer to move forward with MediaWiki > > Juergen +1 Albino

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On 6/10/12 10:36 PM, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote: > 2012/6/10 TJ Frazier > >> On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> >>> > >> Hi, Kay, >> >> >> IIUC, the automatic nav in cwiki is a genealogical thing: every page has a >> parent, and that's what the nav display shows. That is easier than >>

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:30 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: > On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> >> On 06/06/2012 01:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton >>> >> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 on MediaWiki >>> >>>

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

2012/6/10 TJ Frazier > On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> > Hi, Kay, > > > IIUC, the automatic nav in cwiki is a genealogical thing: every page has a > parent, and that's what the nav display shows. That is easier than > categories — if you only want one category for that page. Mwiki

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote: On 06/06/2012 01:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org>> wrote: +1 on MediaWiki The convergence on the Community Wiki was considered early in the migration and it was concluded that

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

..@googlemail.com <mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com>] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 00:37 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 00:37 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki > > On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > > KG01 - See comments inline. > > >

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On 2012/06/06 19:56, Paulo de Souza Lima said: > 2012/6/6 Regina Henschel > >> Hi all, >> >> Herbert Duerr schrieb: >> >>> On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote: >>> It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one. But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot hard

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

2012/6/6 Regina Henschel > Hi all, > > Herbert Duerr schrieb: > >> On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote: >> >>> It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one. >>> But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot harder than just >>> moving. >>> >> >> Agreed. >> >> Speaking o

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

Hi all, Herbert Duerr schrieb: On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote: It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one. But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot harder than just moving. Agreed. Speaking of the OOo/AOO Wiki community the Wiki has been a target of att

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

Herbert Duerr wrote: Speaking of the OOo/AOO Wiki community the Wiki has been a target of attacks by Spambots or Annoybots for a long time. ... Whatever is decided to become the new Wiki I hope it is more resilient against these attacks as we are a high profile target getting plenty of page hits

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

Hi all, chengjh schrieb: Hi, We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical documents and so on..Currently,the planning and project tracking parts have been

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote: It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one. But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot harder than just moving. Agreed. Speaking of the OOo/AOO Wiki community the Wiki has been a target of attacks by Spambots or Annoy

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On 6/5/12 9:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty >> of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical >> docum

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG01 - see comments inline. > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki >>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

I have no opinion whether to join the two Wikis, or discard the current MediaWiki. Actually, the current content on MediaWiki is quite outdated and misleading. We may need significant amount of effort to keep the MediaWiki dated. If we want to keep MediaWiki, we may need to discard a large a

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

KG01 - see comments inline. On Jun 6, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty >> of valuable information,including planning

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh wrote: > Hi, > > We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page  has accumulated plenty > of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical > documents and so on..Currently,the planning and

RE: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

[mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 00:37 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG01 - See comments inline. > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh wrote:

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

2012/6/5 Graham Lauder > > > > it would be indeed nice to have only one wiki. We have unresolved issues > > with the old wiki content (unclear licenses) but MediaWiki as underlying > > wiki software offers more features as far as I can see and the editing > > is smoother for me. Very useful exten

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

> On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > > KG01 - See comments inline. > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki > >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated > >> plenty of valuable information,inc

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG01 - See comments inline. > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty >> of valuable information,including planning,

Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

KG01 - See comments inline. On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh wrote: > Hi, > > We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty > of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical > documents and so o

Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki

Hi, We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical documents and so on..Currently,the planning and project tracking parts have been moved to https://cwiki.apac