On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Nicolas Melot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to setup and use openafs for mobile nodes, not always having a
> connection to the openAFS server. I would like to use the openAFS caching
> mechanism as an offline disk that synchronizes everything once online again.
>
> I installed a
ZFS requires specific tuning for use as a cache partition; otherwise, its
allocation size interacts poorly with the allocation size of cache chunks,
IIRC. I'd imagine something similar is true of btrfs, but I know even less
about btrfs implementation details than ZFS.
-Original Message-
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Fred Drueck wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> According to the OpenAFS admin FAQ, it appears that the officially
> supported file systems for the disk cache are:
>
> ext2
> ext3
> hfs (HP-UX)
> xfs (at least on IRIX 6.5)
> ufs (Solaris, ?Tru64Unix)
>
> which is clearly out of date,
On 5/4/2016 1:44 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> 1.6.14 doesn't need to have single-DES enabled; we shouldn't be
> recommending it. The rxkad.keytab method should work fine with AES keys.
>
> -Ben
+1
To be clear, the entire reason that the KDF extension to the rxkad
security class was implemented i
On 5/3/2016 10:47 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 12:01 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
>>
>> Is this a known issue? Is there somewhere (other than this list) I should
>> file
>> a bug or something?
>
> Ben,
>
> The proper place to send an e-mail would have been
> webmas...@openafs.org. I have
> On 4 Mar 2016, at 15:04, Steve Gaarder wrote:
>
> How safe is it to leave AFS open to the world?
The answer to this depends on a wide variation of factors, including your
threat model, and individual risk assessments. The most important consideration
here is how much benefit you gain from k