Thanks Ben,
My background in CS is modest as are my programming skills. I have a BA in
computer science. I have worked various IT jobs over the years -- none of which
involved serious programming. Sorry if I gave the impression that I would code
(although down the road I think I would like to)
Ken, I am traveling in rural ethiopia with very limited internet till
Monday , and will reply to your query when I'm back to Addis Monday or
Tuesday
What is your background regarding programming, CS and logic, btw?
On Feb 25, 2017 05:10, "Ken Kafieh" wrote:
> I want to help.
>
> My impression
I want to help.
My impression is that "inference control" is the principle hurdle for
opencog, and other AGI efforts. I would like to try my hand at
solving/reducing this problem. I have a general idea of the problem but I
am sure I need a better handle on it. Is there a good description --
Hi,
in this example, deduction rules alone cannot inference anything because
you don't have in your knowledge base things of the sort
Inheritance
A
B
Inheritance
B
C
Some rules are explained in the wiki, like
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/DeductionRule (though I think this section
http
Hi,
This is the data, that i gave,
(EvaluationLink
(PredicateNode "eats")
(ListLink
(ConceptNode "tom")
(ConceptNode "chicken-feet")
)
)
(InheritanceLink (stv 0.9 0.9)
(ConceptNode "tom")
(ConceptNode "chinese")
)
(EvaluationLink
(PredicateNo
Thanks Roman and Nil. Let me have a look.
On Wednesday, 22 February 2017 22:36:39 UTC+1, Nil wrote:
>
> I believe the BC itself is mature enough. However there are still a few
> commits on the pattern matcher that I need to push and discuss with
> Linas (these commits are only required if you us
