Hi
To the first question – technical: Is it possible to have context on a
persistent composition?
Yes – I think that should be possible. Some will argue that the context is an
EVENT_CONTEXT and such context should only be used for event based
Compositions. I think it makes sense to have some
Hi Silje,
Can you tell us more about the background? Are you trying to provide the
model for the message, or to store the data when it is received (or both)?
Where does the data come from and how is it managed / curated? Does it come
from a single clinician (presumably GP) or from multiple
Hi Bjørn and Ian!
The original use case for this code set was adverse reactions, but with the
development of the national summary records, it’s been expanded for use with
other kinds of critical information as specified below. This means that it
needs to be used across the adverse reaction
Thanks Diego,
I was hoping you would confirm that.
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: i...@freshehr.com
twitter: @ianmcnicoll
Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks - it makes much more sense in the context of Adverse reaction but
TBH I still doubt very much if this 'provenance' source metadata is
captured or known reliably. I asked a couple of UK GP colleagues and they
agreed. I would argue that this data a) often not available b)
Hi
The specified terminology ( OID 2.16.578.1.12.4.1.7498 (Source of information)
) is defined as “options to specify the source of data for an allergic
reaction” (my translation).
Which means this is specific for adverse reaction – and I think it should be
archetyped to model this
6 matches
Mail list logo