2012-09-06 18:23, Gary Mills пишет:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:06:15AM -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
Whoops! Make that "I was wondering if I should include the client".
I guessed that was it. I'd expect the client to be in a separate
package since it should replace `dhcpagent' and possibly `dhcpi
James Carlson wrote:
> On 09/07/12 09:12, Gary Gendel wrote:
> At a guess, you may need to do this:
>
> ifconfig inet6 bge0 plumb up
Obviously, that should have been:
ifconfig bge0 inet6 plumb up
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W
_
On 09/07/12 09:12, Gary Gendel wrote:
> I fail with a "No route to host" message. The full output is:
"No route to host" typically means that the routing table has trouble,
not that there's anything wrong with IP Filter.
At a guess, you may need to do this:
ifconfig inet6 bge0 plumb up
Actually, since I'm only interested in prefix delegation, I tried an
experiment.
My external nic is bge0 and my internal nic is bge1.
I have ipfilter set up currently to allow everything on ipv6:
pass in on any all
pass out on any all
When I start dhclient to get the address block from the DH
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:06:15AM -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Whoops! Make that "I was wondering if I should include the client".
I guessed that was it. I'd expect the client to be in a separate
package since it should replace `dhcpagent' and possibly `dhcpinfo'
and `in.ndpd', and might require
Whoops! Make that "I was wondering if I should include the client".
On 9/6/12 9:58 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
Au contraire mon frere. :)
I packaged the server up and I'm waiting for the thumbs up to push it
into the main branch. I was wondering if I should include the server.
As for the client
Au contraire mon frere. :)
I packaged the server up and I'm waiting for the thumbs up to push it
into the main branch. I was wondering if I should include the server.
As for the client on Solaris, my interpretation of the text tells me
that it may work but since it exists on Solaris they don
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:51:58PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
>
> >Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't
> >wholesale replace the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If
> >we don't get any updates downstream from Oracle we will
Jon,
Oracle is deprecating the Sun dhcp server and replacing it with ISC
based upon what I've been reading. It's one of the reasons that Oracle
pushed changes to the ISC source. Regardless, I have no reason to
replace the server since it has everything I need in a dhcp server.
Others don't a
On 6 September 2012 02:51, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
>> If the answer is that I should be able to replace it, the next question is
>> if anyone has done this before and how difficult this would be to do.
>
>
> I assume you are talking about the client and not
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale replace
the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get any updates
downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6 prefix
delegation. This feature is bec
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale replace
> the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get any updates
> downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6 prefix
> delegation.
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale
replace the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get
any updates downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6
prefix delegation. This feature is becoming important as some big ISPs
(i.e. C
13 matches
Mail list logo
