On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:02:43 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> This problem has been fixed
> [upstream](https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/23282). This patch merges
> the fix in advance.
>
> Error log:
>
>
> /some_dir/jfx/modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Source/WTF/wt
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:24:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This problem has been fixed
>> [upstream](https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/23282). This patch merges
>> the fix in advance.
>>
>> Error log:
>>
>>
>>
This problem has been fixed
[upstream](https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/23282). This patch merges the
fix in advance.
Error log:
/some_dir/jfx/modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Source/WTF/wtf/StackPointer.cpp:140:2:
error: #error "Unsupported platform: need implementation of
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 06:36:51 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> [JDK-8297068](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297068) updated boot JDK
> to 19.0.1 from 18.0.2, and
> [JDK-8321434](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321434) updated boot JDK
> to 21.0.1. `CONTRIBUTING.md` shoul
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:37:15 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> [JDK-8297068](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297068) updated boot JDK
>> to 19.0.1 from 18.0.2, and
>> [JDK-8321434](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321434) updated boot JDK
>> to 21.0.1. `CONTRIBUTING.md` should be updated
[JDK-8297068](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297068) updated boot JDK to
19.0.1 from 18.0.2, and
[JDK-8321434](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321434) updated boot JDK to
21.0.1. `CONTRIBUTING.md` should be updated correspondingly.
-
Commit messages:
- 8325093: Update
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:28:51 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> Clean backport. Verified on Linux/LoongArch64, Linux/x64 and Linux/aarch64.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1b99a5b2
Author: Ao Qi
Committer: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/com
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 08:44:53 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Clean backport. Verified on Linux/LoongArch64, Linux/x64 and Linux/aarch64.
>
> I'm ok with this.
> Apart from the functionality, this BP also makes it easier to backport future
> changes in build.gradle (because it backports a structural
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:29:27 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> Clean backport. Verified on (after #102):
> - Linux/LoongArch64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `on`, the platform triggering
> this problem)
> - Linux/x64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `off`)
> - Linux/aarch64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `off`)
Th
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:28:51 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> Clean backport. Verified on Linux/LoongArch64, Linux/x64 and Linux/aarch64.
RFC and RFR. Thanks. Should I take this PR out of Draft?
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/102
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:41:49 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Clean backport. Verified on Linux/LoongArch64, Linux/x64 and Linux/aarch64.
>
> Backports to `jfx17u` require prior approval. You will need to seek such
> approval from one of the project leads before taking this PR out of Draft.
>
>
Clean backport. Verified on Linux/LoongArch64, Linux/x64 and Linux/aarch64.
-
Commit messages:
- 8293214: Add support for Linux/LoongArch64
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/102/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx17u=102=00
Issue:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 05:30:56 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `List.of` is cleaner, and can slightly reduce the memory footprint for lists
> of one or two elements.
>
> Because `List.of` can only store non-null elements, I have only replaced a
> few usage.
>
> Can someone open an Issue on JBS for me?
Clean backport. Verified on (after #102):
- Linux/LoongArch64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `on`, the platform triggering this
problem)
- Linux/x64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `off`)
- Linux/aarch64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `off`)
-
Commit messages:
- 8293375: add_definitions
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:29:27 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> Clean backport. Verified on (after #102):
> - Linux/LoongArch64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `on`, the platform triggering
> this problem)
> - Linux/x64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `off`)
> - Linux/aarch64 (`USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `off
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:19:23 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> LoongArch is a new RISC ISA. This issue proposes adding support for
> Linux/LoongArch64. Upstream WebKit for LoongArch64 support is not ready, but
> the OpenJFX part is simple and ready. When the LoongArch64 supported Webkit
>
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:09:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Ao Qi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> disable msse2 by default, use IS_LOONGARCH64 and IS_AARCH64
>
> The changes look good.
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:31:54 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Ao Qi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> disable msse2 by default, use IS_LOONGARCH64 and IS_AARCH64
>
> It looks good. I'll do a build an
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:31:54 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> It looks good. I'll do a build and then hopefully I can approve (those
> ifeq/ifneq changes often need more than a few pair of eyes)
Yes. We need to check it carefully:) I did some tests like:
ifneq (,$(findstring $(ARCH), x64 x32
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 12:02:37 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Ao Qi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> revert
>
> This PR looks safe to me. I don't see a scenario where this can cause
> regress
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:59:42 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Ao Qi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> revert
>
> build.gradle line 313:
>
>> 311: } else if (IS_MAC && OS_ARCH != "
nd graphics tests, {Release,Debug}, without
> WebKit on Linux/loongarch64
Ao Qi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
disable msse2 by default, use IS_LOONGARCH64 and IS_AARCH64
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.o
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 23:00:22 GMT, Alexander Matveev wrote:
>> Ao Qi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> revert
>
> Media changes looks good.
Thanks for the review, @sashamatveev.
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 01:19:07 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> jfx web failed to build when `USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC` is `ON`:
>
>
> jfx/modules/javafx.web/build/linux/Release/WTF/Headers/wtf/Platform.h:58,
> jfx/modules/javafx.web/build/linux/Release/WTF/Headers/wtf/Assertions.h:28,
>
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:51:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> The easiest way is to push an empty commit to your branch.
Thanks, @kevinrushforth . The GHA tests passed. Some additional test results
were updated in the PR description.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/888
> LoongArch is a new RISC ISA. This issue proposes adding support for
> Linux/LoongArch64. Upstream WebKit for LoongArch64 support is not ready, but
> the OpenJFX part is simple and ready. When the LoongArch64 supported Webkit
> is updated to OpenJFX, it is supposed to work.
Ao Qi
> LoongArch is a new RISC ISA. This issue proposes adding support for
> Linux/LoongArch64. Upstream WebKit for LoongArch64 support is not ready, but
> the OpenJFX part is simple and ready. When the LoongArch64 supported Webkit
> is updated to OpenJFX, it is supposed to work.
Ao Qi
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:19:23 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
> LoongArch is a new RISC ISA. This issue proposes adding support for
> Linux/LoongArch64. Upstream WebKit for LoongArch64 support is not ready, but
> the OpenJFX part is simple and ready. When the LoongArch64 supported Webkit
>
LoongArch is a new RISC ISA. This issue proposes adding support for
Linux/LoongArch64. Upstream WebKit for LoongArch64 support is not ready, but
the OpenJFX part is simple and ready. When the LoongArch64 supported Webkit is
updated to OpenJFX, it is supposed to work.
-
Commit
29 matches
Mail list logo
