Re: tcpwrappers / openssh

2003-12-04 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote: > Have Matthias' changes for openssh (below) been incorporated in > openssh-3.7.1p2-20031125.src.rpm? > Matthias' patch to make openssh with_wrap work on Solaris was incorporated into openssh-3.7.1p2-20031204.src.rpm today. Unfortunately TCP Wrappers d

Re: tcpwrappers

2003-12-03 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote: >Thanks for the info, Bill. > >I take it from your reply (and from not finding any references to RBL in the >original code) that this patch actually creates this previously non-existing >feature? > >Where can I find a copy of this patch, should I want t

RE: tcpwrappers

2003-12-03 Thread Dennis McRitchie
, Dennis > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: tcpwrappers > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote: &g

Re: tcpwrappers

2003-12-03 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote: >What is the RBL patch, and what are the consequences of not having it? Where >can I get more information about it? The RBL patch allows one to specify dnsRBLs (Realtime Blackhole Lists) in the /etc/hosts.allow file. We used this extensively with smai

Re: tcpwrappers

2003-12-03 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote: > Another question: will the OpenPKG team inform Steve Grubb about the > problems found with and patches applied to his code? He indicates in his > README file that he will continue to maintain the package until Wietse > releases a new version (could be

RE: tcpwrappers

2003-12-03 Thread Dennis McRitchie
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis McRitchie > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: tcpwrappers > > > What is the RBL patch, and what are the consequences of not > having it? Where can I get more information abo

Re: tcpwrappers / openssh

2003-12-03 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dennis McRitchie wrote: > Have Matthias' changes for openssh (below) been incorporated in > openssh-3.7.1p2-20031125.src.rpm? > No, they haven't. I've just rolled a new openssh package with the changes though. It will be uploaded as soon as I can verify that it is a necessary

RE: tcpwrappers

2003-12-03 Thread Dennis McRitchie
1, 2003 3:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: tcpwrappers > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > > > >Is anybody working on tcpwrappers for Solaris ? > > >I got it to compile, but it does not work as expected, so > one needs > &

RE: tcpwrappers / openssh

2003-12-03 Thread Dennis McRitchie
Have Matthias' changes for openssh (below) been incorporated in openssh-3.7.1p2-20031125.src.rpm? Thanks, Dennis > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Kurz > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tcpwrappers

2003-10-31 Thread Matthias Kurz
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > >Hi. > > > >Is anybody working on tcpwrappers for Solaris ? > >I got it to compile, but it does not work as expected, so one needs > >to do some debugging. I'm going to do this, when nobody speeks up. >

Re: tcpwrappers

2003-10-31 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > >Is anybody working on tcpwrappers for Solaris ? > >I got it to compile, but it does not work as expected, so one needs > >to do some debugging. I'm going to do this, when nobody speeks up. > > I haven't tried it, but do know that there was a bigendian

Re: tcpwrappers

2003-10-31 Thread Bill Campbell
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote: > >Hi. > >Is anybody working on tcpwrappers for Solaris ? >I got it to compile, but it does not work as expected, so one needs >to do some debugging. I'm going to do this, when nobody speeks up. I haven't tried it, but do know that there was a bigendian i