I ran your message through a translator because I do not know french. Hope you
do not mind.
"Hello everybody,
Then I resume my problem.
I have a OpenSolaris machine with 2 network card, 1 1 prod sharing a ZFS pool
ISCSI 1TB ISCSI in with Deduplication.
At my client, a Windows 2008 R2 with mi
You can find and download packages here:
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release/en/index.shtml
You can also look in the DDU (Device Driver Utility) and see if your Network
card is showing up there at all, if a driver is loaded or if it has failed.
I know I have had trouble with NWAM being a bit obt
Your best bet is to look at the NIC's on the HCL:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/os/
Then look them up and see what NIC's can do what you need. Happy Hunting. :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
ope
> Are you sure your processor is 32bit?
no i'm not, but i have win7 x86, it can show anything about my system, then it
says that my system is x86 capable. i've also tried to install its x64 version
but the installer didn't ran.
anyway, i'll double check. thanks kornax
> Are you sure you chos
i tried the cd on my classmate's laptop, the message that supposedly will
display next is the options for languages, but none popped-out. it just showed
something like "opensolaris 2009.06 64-bit OS".. i've waited hours for the
language menu but it's just blank..
thanks @jkeil, i'll try what yo
>
> More thoughts please! :)
Or you could continue using eiher Opensolaris 2009.06 or snv_b134 until Oracle
release what suppose to be Opensolaris replacement Solaris 11 Express at the
end of the year, and it is mention, that it might include "ZFS data
encryption", not seen anywhere else unt
On 10/ 6/10 03:18 AM, Steve wrote:
I guess another question is, if I am successful with 134b, it is of course still
"unstable" release. How much do i need to worry about that? I have seen a
fair amount of people on the internet stating they run solidly on 134b.
I am strictly using this as a
> please somebody help me install my opensolaris
> 2009.06 x86 using live cd. i have x86 - system,
> however, when i booted the cd, it showed that x64 bit
> OS was loaded.
That is, you have a 64-bit capable x86 system...
> then it halted..
Try to boot the kernel with option "-v".
Append it at t
Steve wrote:
> I am currently upgrading to 134b. Using the openindiana legacy source.
That should just be 134, since Oracle never released 134a or 134b.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
__
Interesting!
The question of what would happen if a security issue arose in 134b
needs to be considered as well as the possibility of using a newer
(better?) version of ZFS.
I would not want to run dedup on production at the moment but would
really like it at a later date.
For that to happen I wou
I guess another question is, if I am successful with 134b, it is of course
still "unstable" release. How much do i need to worry about that? I have seen
a fair amount of people on the internet stating they run solidly on 134b.
I am strictly using this as a data storage server and ZFS is my rea
Are you sure your processor is 32bit?
Are you sure you chose the correct installation options?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org
I had not planned on this having third party support.
I am currently upgrading to 134b. Using the openindiana legacy source. I plan
to test and see how this runs, and then choose whether to move forward or
completely to openindiana at this point.
I am mostly sure I will be sticking with 134b
13 matches
Mail list logo