On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:57:21AM +, a y wrote:
HMTL-gibberish...
This indicates that there is a "b" missing in an `fopen("...","w")' that
should read `fopen("...","wb")', such that a "LF" is transformed to "CR/LF".
I suppose you are running OpenSSL on a Windows platform. Before I start
trac
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 01:05:32PM -0700, Tom Vaughan wrote:
> We've researched this[1] problem further and have found that "on occasion",
> in the Server Hello, in response to a request to resume a session, the MAC
> is bad. We've now seen this problem with both IE and Netscape. This appears
> to
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:20:17AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:57:21AM +, a y wrote:
> HMTL-gibberish...
>
> This indicates that there is a "b" missing in an `fopen("...","w")' that
> should read `fopen("...","wb")', such that a "LF" is transformed to "CR/LF".
> I
I am programming the simple Server-Client message exchange
program using OpenSSL.
but i encountered this error message.
Error message :
"SSL_ERROR_SSL",
"error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared
cipher"
"SSL_ERROR_SSL",
"error:14077410:SSL routines:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:29:26PM +0900, Kukmin, Han wrote:
> I am programming the simple Server-Client message exchange program using OpenSSL.
> but i encountered this error message.
>
> Error message :
>
>
> "SSL_ERROR_SSL",
> "error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared cip
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001
platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc
This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but an annoying
deviation from the standards of shared library versioning. All the bugfix
subversions of 0.9.6{,a,b} have the same extension lib...so.0.9.6 but are
not replace
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:36:22PM +0200, Hans Werner Strube wrote:
> OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001
> platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc
> This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but an annoying
> deviation from the standards of shared library versioning. All the bugfix
> subvers
Hello,
I need some help regarding mmh amd mmh-mac. Any help is appreciated:
* what is exactly the difference between mmh amd mmh-mac?
* Does openssl support mmh amd mmh-mac? if not, is there any public source
available for these?
Thanks, Jim
_
From: Hans Werner Strube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
strube> OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001
strube> platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc
strube> This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but
strube> an annoying deviation from the standards of shared library
strube> versioning. All the bugfix
From: "Jamshid Shoghli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jshoghli> I need some help regarding mmh amd mmh-mac. Any help is appreciated:
jshoghli> * what is exactly the difference between mmh amd mmh-mac?
jshoghli> * Does openssl support mmh amd mmh-mac? if not, is there any public source
jshoghli> available f
Multi-linear Modular Hash. Here is a refernce for mmh. (I was under the same
impression that openssl has nothing to do with mmh):
MMH: Software Message Authentication in Gbit/sec Rates,
S. Halevi and H. Krawczyk, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Fast Software
Encryption, (1997)
JS
> -Or
From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lutz.Jaenicke> It is correct in the sense that using the same name
Lutz.Jaenicke> (0.9.6) for different versions, that are not binary
Lutz.Jaenicke> compatible, does not make sense. We'll have to keep
Lutz.Jaenicke> this in mind for the 0.9.7 and later ver
Pardon me for barging in, but I just thought a link to the actual paper,
courtesy of NEC's excellent Citeseer service, might come in handy:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/8352.html
Is there a specific reason you're looking into using MMH specifically as
opposed to UMAC? (Halevi, Krawczyk et al):
ht
> > > Perhaps, I'll produce some actual numbers using OpenSSL and
> > > both implementations to prove my case.
> >
> > Note and respect that OpenSSL is cross-platform toolkit
> > meaning that we might face and resolve a trade-off.
>
> Totally understood. OpenSSL should work well on all the
> plat
14 matches
Mail list logo