Re: Possible bug in openssl 0.9.6b

2001-07-23 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:57:21AM +, a y wrote: HMTL-gibberish... This indicates that there is a "b" missing in an `fopen("...","w")' that should read `fopen("...","wb")', such that a "LF" is transformed to "CR/LF". I suppose you are running OpenSSL on a Windows platform. Before I start trac

Re: session resumption and bad mac

2001-07-23 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 01:05:32PM -0700, Tom Vaughan wrote: > We've researched this[1] problem further and have found that "on occasion", > in the Server Hello, in response to a request to resume a session, the MAC > is bad. We've now seen this problem with both IE and Netscape. This appears > to

Re: Possible bug in openssl 0.9.6b

2001-07-23 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:20:17AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:57:21AM +, a y wrote: > HMTL-gibberish... > > This indicates that there is a "b" missing in an `fopen("...","w")' that > should read `fopen("...","wb")', such that a "LF" is transformed to "CR/LF". > I

No shared cipher & sslv3 alert handshake failure

2001-07-23 Thread Kukmin, Han
I am programming the simple Server-Client message exchange program using OpenSSL. but i encountered this error message.   Error message :   "SSL_ERROR_SSL", "error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared cipher"   "SSL_ERROR_SSL", "error:14077410:SSL routines:

Re: No shared cipher & sslv3 alert handshake failure

2001-07-23 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:29:26PM +0900, Kukmin, Han wrote: > I am programming the simple Server-Client message exchange program using OpenSSL. > but i encountered this error message. > > Error message : > > > "SSL_ERROR_SSL", > "error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared cip

shared library versioning

2001-07-23 Thread Hans Werner Strube
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001 platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but an annoying deviation from the standards of shared library versioning. All the bugfix subversions of 0.9.6{,a,b} have the same extension lib...so.0.9.6 but are not replace

Re: shared library versioning

2001-07-23 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:36:22PM +0200, Hans Werner Strube wrote: > OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001 > platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc > This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but an annoying > deviation from the standards of shared library versioning. All the bugfix > subvers

mmh and mmh-mac

2001-07-23 Thread Jamshid Shoghli
Hello, I need some help regarding mmh amd mmh-mac. Any help is appreciated: * what is exactly the difference between mmh amd mmh-mac? * Does openssl support mmh amd mmh-mac? if not, is there any public source available for these? Thanks, Jim _

Re: shared library versioning

2001-07-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Hans Werner Strube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> strube> OpenSSL version: 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001 strube> platform: solaris-sparcv8-cc strube> This concerns not an actual bug in compilation or function but strube> an annoying deviation from the standards of shared library strube> versioning. All the bugfix

Re: mmh and mmh-mac

2001-07-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: "Jamshid Shoghli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jshoghli> I need some help regarding mmh amd mmh-mac. Any help is appreciated: jshoghli> * what is exactly the difference between mmh amd mmh-mac? jshoghli> * Does openssl support mmh amd mmh-mac? if not, is there any public source jshoghli> available f

RE: mmh and mmh-mac

2001-07-23 Thread Jamshid Shoghli
Multi-linear Modular Hash. Here is a refernce for mmh. (I was under the same impression that openssl has nothing to do with mmh): MMH: Software Message Authentication in Gbit/sec Rates, S. Halevi and H. Krawczyk, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Fast Software Encryption, (1997) JS > -Or

Re: shared library versioning

2001-07-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lutz.Jaenicke> It is correct in the sense that using the same name Lutz.Jaenicke> (0.9.6) for different versions, that are not binary Lutz.Jaenicke> compatible, does not make sense. We'll have to keep Lutz.Jaenicke> this in mind for the 0.9.7 and later ver

Re: mmh and mmh-mac

2001-07-23 Thread Oscar Jacobsson
Pardon me for barging in, but I just thought a link to the actual paper, courtesy of NEC's excellent Citeseer service, might come in handy: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/8352.html Is there a specific reason you're looking into using MMH specifically as opposed to UMAC? (Halevi, Krawczyk et al): ht

Re: Rijndael patch

2001-07-23 Thread Andy Polyakov
> > > Perhaps, I'll produce some actual numbers using OpenSSL and > > > both implementations to prove my case. > > > > Note and respect that OpenSSL is cross-platform toolkit > > meaning that we might face and resolve a trade-off. > > Totally understood. OpenSSL should work well on all the > plat