Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
The SSL spec isn't clear on the format of the DSS signature.
I hadn't noticed that problem -- the TLS RFC does have an explicit
definition ("hashing [...] produces two values, r and s. The DSS
signature is an opaque vector [...] the contents of which
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Jerry Baker wrote:
After thouroughly following the directions that come with the
distribution (including fixing some broken stuff that's not documented
like a bunch of link files in place of some includes), I am running into
an error that I cannot figure out. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have C++ module where I want to use SSL objects.
I am including some openssl .h files which include "des.h".
"des.h" declares function crypt() .
I had a similar problem a longtime ago. As I recall we fixed it by
adding
#define
I did compile 0.9.2b on Win98 w/ VC6.0 and no problem.
(followed the same steps as described below)
fyi.
-Original Message-
From: Erwann ABALEA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: Compiling OpenSSL 0.9.2b on
hey,
Did this ever happen? I looked on CPAN a couple of days ago, but saw nothing..
Ed
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
My continued efforts to install Net::SSLeay on NT have hit another
hurdle.
Firstly I have,
1. Built openssl-0.9.1c without asm to build the win32dll's.
2. Copied this entire directory structure toit's installation directory.
3. Renames out32dll to bin so that Makefile.pl in Net::SSLeay
Hubert Froehlich wrote:
Um, I am working on the same. The scripts mentioned above already include the
'msie_hack' option...
When working on the Unix side all works fine. Just when trying them out with
MSIE I got some error code like 0x80092004
I'm familiar with Unix, Linux and all
Bodo Moeller wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
The SSL spec isn't clear on the format of the DSS signature.
I hadn't noticed that problem -- the TLS RFC does have an explicit
definition ("hashing [...] produces two values, r and s. The DSS
signature is an opaque
Andy,
I just went throught the considerable pain in almost exactly what you
have
done so far. I was extremly lucky to get the help of the folks on
this and
some other news groups. I am including 4 messages that detail many
steps that
need to be taken to fix files in the build process. Read all
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 02:15:23PM +, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Bodo Moeller wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The SSL spec isn't clear on the format of the DSS signature.
I hadn't noticed that problem -- the TLS RFC does have an explicit
definition ("hashing [...] produces
(sorry.. forgot to finish send this message off.. there you go)
Mike Hess wrote:
I believe I encountered a problem compiling openssl-0.9.2b on IRIX 6.2
similar to the one encountered in an earlier note on Digital UNIX V4.0E.
I used the solution 1, (./Configure irix-cc no-asm) recommended
Hi,
I'm have one AIX box withless Internet conection and not
C compile too.
Anyone have SSLtelnet work like a charm in AIX 3.4
or know any url for binary package?
Thanks for your time and attention,
--
./nelson -murilo
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Niels Poppe wrote:
(sorry.. forgot to finish send this message off.. there you go)
[chop]
There has been some discussion on bn_div_words around in openssl-dev:
From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: A.L. Group plc
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
13 matches
Mail list logo