On Sun January 1 2012, grarpamp wrote:
Translation: I have to agree with O.P. - It looks broke to me too. ;-)
Heh, that's precisely what I said in my report :) The front end
options to do it seem to exist, and they even have some brief
descriptions as such. They just don't work :)
Translation: I have to agree with O.P. - It looks broke to me too. ;-)
Heh, that's precisely what I said in my report :) The front end
options to do it seem to exist, and they even have some brief
descriptions as such. They just don't work :)
'zlib' should get us static inclusion.
On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
My replies below are about how to achieve this without GNU specific
On Tue December 27 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Tue December 27 2011, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do
On Tue December 27 2011, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
My replies
On Tue December 27 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Tue December 27 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Tue December 27 2011, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
My replies below are about how to achieve this without GNU specific options
and without having to edit the Configure and Makefiles. These answers do
not apply to
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
My replies below are about how to achieve this without GNU specific options
and without having to edit the
On Mon December 19 2011, grarpamp wrote:
I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
For testing I put zlib125 in its own dir.
Then for openssl...
./config
--prefix=path
--with-zlib-include=dir/include
1. Make sure there is a libz.a in /lib or /usr/lib, otherwise you have no
static zlib to link in.
Of course there's an old libz.a there. And it should not matter as
we're given the --with-zlib arguments to point the build elsewhere
for those libraries. And as seen in the report, it is following
On 12/19/2011 10:38 AM, grarpamp wrote:
I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
For testing I put zlib125 in its owndir.
Then for openssl...
./config
--prefix=path
--with-zlib-include=dir/include
--with-zlib-lib=dir/lib
shared
I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
For testing I put zlib125 in its own dir.
Then for openssl...
./config
--prefix=path
--with-zlib-include=dir/include
--with-zlib-lib=dir/lib
shared
zlib
make
make install
This gives...
12 matches
Mail list logo
