FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy
enough thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which
the product is held even in commit messages and comments (consider the
'broken window theory'). Of course everyone makes mistakes (I am a
terrible speller)
On 3/4/15 11:31 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I personally don't think adding new cores without cleaning up that
list is something healthy for our community, which is what we're
trying to improve here. Therefore I'm still -2-W on adding new folks
without removing
Hello all,
I am trying to setup a devstack vagrant virtualbox VM and running into
network troubles. I can successful launch an container but docker and
openstack disagree on the IP address of that instance. Docker has the
correct IP. I an running devstack stable/havana on ubuntu 12.04. My
George,
Thanks for the comments, they make a lot of sense. There is a Glance
team meeting on Thursday where we would like to push a bit further on
this. Would you mind sending in a few more details? Perhaps a sample of
what your ideal layout would be? As an example, how would you prefer
On 08/23/2013 07:15 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
I'm fine with either times. So maybe 1600 for all?
That time works for me.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Mark, good thoughts (as usual)
On 08/19/2013 09:15 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
The goal isn't really to replace sqlalchemy completely.
Perhaps my problem is that I am not exactly sure what the goals are.
Cleanup (BL mixed in the BL seems wrong)? HA or performance (are people
hitting limits
On 08/20/2013 05:56 AM, Victor Ruiz wrote:
No, the conf file wasn't the problem.
I finally found it in /opt/stack/glance/glance/store/base.py, in the line:
msg = _(Failed to configure store correctly: %s
Disabling add method. % e)
This looks like a bug. I
All I'm saying is that we should be careful not to swap one set of
problems for another.
My 2 cents: I am in agreement with Jay. I am leery of NoSQL being a
direct sub in and I fear that this effort can be adding a large workload
for little benefit.
A somewhat related post:
On 08/05/2013 04:34 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Well, it's tomorrow as I write this, maybe it's today as you read
this. Anyway:
- asynchronous worker meeting Tuesday 6 Aug 2013 14:00 UTC in
#openstack-glance
- the etherpad
https://etherpad.openstack.org/havana-glance-requirements was
I believe we should fix the unittests to not shell out to glance-manage
in that manner. One of the nice things about moving the code from bin/
to glance.cmd is that it's available inside of the source tree for
unittests! :) What we want to do is call the glance.cmd.manage:main()
function
10 matches
Mail list logo
