Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it
easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from
every gate job that is run as check. What if set a policy that when a
gate queue gets a race:
- put a zuul stop all
On 06/16/2014 04:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it
easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from
every gate job that is run as check. What if set a policy that when a
gate
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
So if we can't evolve the system back towards health, we need to just
cut a bunch of stuff off until we can.
+1 This is kind of the crux of the biscuit. As things stand there's
so much noise that it's far too easy to think and act like it is
somebody
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/13/2014 06:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
mailto:dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 11:36 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
If someone can point me to a case where we've actually found this kind
of bug with tempest / devstack, that would be great. I've just *never*
seen it. I was the one that did most of the fixing for pg support in
Nova, and have helped other
On 16 Jun 2014 20:33, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it
easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from
every gate job that is run as check. What if set a
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/13/2014 06:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
mailto:dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014 22:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/16/2014 04:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it
easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from
every gate job
On Jun 14, 2014 11:12 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
You know its bad when you can't sleep because you're redesigning gate
workflows in your head so I apologise that this email is perhaps
not as rational, nor as organised, as usual - but , . :)
Obviously this is
On 06/13/2014 06:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
mailto:dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net
You know its bad when you can't sleep because you're redesigning gate
workflows in your head so I apologise that this email is perhaps
not as rational, nor as organised, as usual - but , . :)
Obviously this is very important to address, and if we can come up
with something systemic I'm
On 06/13/2014 02:36 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 22:10 -0400, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to
start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't
On 06/12/2014 10:10 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to
start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different
enough to bother testing on every commit.
In order to
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 07:31 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/13/2014 02:36 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 22:10 -0400, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to
start
On 06/13/2014 08:13 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 07:31 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/13/2014 02:36 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 22:10 -0400, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
We're definitely deep into capacity
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu,
We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to
start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different
enough to bother testing on every commit.
Previously we've been testing Postgresql in the gate because it has a
stricter interpretation of SQL than MySQL.
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
However Monty brought up a good point at Summit, that MySQL has a strict
mode. That should actually enforce the same strictness.
I would vote -1 on that, simply because using PostgreSQL should be more
than that just doing strict SQL.
For example, in
On 06/12/2014 08:15 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
However Monty brought up a good point at Summit, that MySQL has a strict
mode. That should actually enforce the same strictness.
I would vote -1 on that, simply because using PostgreSQL should be more
than
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping jobs alive based on the theory that they might one day be useful
is something we just don't have the liberty to do any more. We've not
seen an idle node in zuul in
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping jobs alive based on the theory that they might one day be useful
is something we just don't have the liberty to do any
On 6/12/2014 9:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping jobs alive based on the theory that they might one day be useful
is something
On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping jobs alive based on the theory that they might one day be useful
is
On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping jobs alive
On 06/12/2014 08:36 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping jobs alive based on the theory that
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 12 June 2014 17:37
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in
the gate
...
But if we're talking about a devstack
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2014-06-12 08:15:46 -0700:
On 6/12/2014 9:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests?
Not in an accurate manner, no.
Keeping
On 06/12/2014 12:24 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or
On 6/12/2014 5:11 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to
start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different
enough to bother testing on every
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
That's not cacthable in unit or functional
30 matches
Mail list logo
