On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov <
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since
> Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of
> conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Adrian Otto
wrote:
> Joe,
>
> I must respectfully disagree. The statistics you used to indicate that
> Magnum did not benefit from joining the tent are not telling the whole
> story. Facts:
>
Agreed, after looking at the numbers some more, I don't know if i wo
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 06/15/2015 06:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
>>
>> 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
>> the integrated release failing to get the recogni
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
>
> 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
> the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve.
> "Non-official" projects are
Joe,
I must respectfully disagree. The statistics you used to indicate that Magnum
did not benefit from joining the tent are not telling the whole story. Facts:
1) When we had our Midcycle just before joining OpenStack in March we had 24
contributors from 13 affiliations when we joined. You wer
On 06/16/2015 08:16 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since
Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of
conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly by the fact
that Murano is now "officially" re
In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since
Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of
conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly by the fact
that Murano is now "officially" recognized in OpenStack community. It might
be a wrong pe
You may also find my explanation about the Big Tent helpful in this
interview with Niki Acosta and Jeff Dickey:
http://blogs.cisco.com/cloud/ospod-29-jay-pipes
Best,
-jay
On 06/16/2015 06:09 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 16/06/15 04:39 -0400, gordon chung wrote:
i won't speak to whether this
On 16/06/15 04:39 -0400, gordon chung wrote:
i won't speak to whether this confirms/refutes the usefulness of the big tent.
that said, probably as a by-product of being in non-stop meetings with sales/
marketing/managers for last few days, i think there needs to be better
definitions (or better p
i won't speak to whether this confirms/refutes the usefulness of the big
tent. that said, probably as a by-product of being in non-stop meetings
with sales/marketing/managers for last few days, i think there needs to
be better definitions (or better publicised definitions) of what the
goals of
I'd also like to point out that if the state of the projects has encouraged
*new* contributors to OpenStack, then their contributions will likely take a
couple to a few months to become visible in a significant way in the
statistics. Two to three months to get your first merge is extremely commo
Joe Gordon wrote:
> [...]
> Below is a list of the first few few projects to join OpenStack after
> the big tent, All of which have now been part of OpenStack for at least
> two months.[1]
>
> * Mangum - Tue Mar 24 20:17:36 2015
> * Murano - Tue Mar 24 20:48:25 2015
> * Congress - Tue Mar 31 20:2
On 15/06/15 19:20 +0900, Joe Gordon wrote:
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside the
integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve. "Non-official"
projects are second- or third-
On 06/15/2015 07:30 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Joe,
When looking at stackalytics [2] for each project, we don't see any
noticeably change in number of reviews, contributors, or number of
commits from before and after each project joined OpenStack.
I can't agree on this.
*) Rally is
Joe,
When looking at stackalytics [2] for each project, we don't see any
> noticeably change in number of reviews, contributors, or number of commits
> from before and after each project joined OpenStack.
I can't agree on this.
*) Rally is facing core-reviewers bottleneck currently.
We have abo
On 06/15/2015 06:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve.
"Non-official" projects are second- or third-c
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve.
"Non-official" projects are second- or third-class citizens which can't get
development re
17 matches
Mail list logo
