On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Rikimaru Honjo
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thank you for replying!
>
> On 2018/08/22 2:20, Mikhail Medvedev wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Rikimaru Honjo
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
it to the email filter list
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/270
>
> Best regards,
> --
> _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> Rikimaru Honjo
> E-mail:honjo.rikim...@po.ntt-tx.co.jp
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> Ope
ators using the module are welcome to chime in.
Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
tly what it says it is - jjb can not find a
publisher macro named 'afs'. If you look into project-config/tox.ini
's testenv:jjb section, you'll see that it does 'pip install -U
jenkins/modules/jjb_afs', which I assume installs the missing macro.
So you can either install tha
st
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
--
Mikhail Medvedev
IBM
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
There is also puppet-openstackci module that aims to provide most of
configuration necessary to setup an OpenStack CI. See the
documentation at
https://github.com/openstack-infra/puppet-openstackci/blob/master/doc/source/third_party_ci.rst
---
Mikhail Medvedev
IBM OpenStack CI for KVM on Power
tps://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Plugins+affected+by+fix+for+SECURITY-170
>
> Thank you
>
> BRs
> liyuanzhen
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
9
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for any hint/suggestion
>
> Michal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
> Registered in Ireland
> Registered Offi
at
1500 UTC and Tuesdays at 0800 UTC.
Anita - would you able to temporary disable the IBM GPFS CI
(rsand...@in.ibm.com) in case flushing account ssh keys does not work?
Thanks,
Mikhail Medvedev
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Digvijay B Ukirde
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Currently
sure you read and follow guidelines for third-party CIs at
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
>
>
> Thanks,
> Digvijay
> Mikhail Medvedev ---03/16/2016 03:43:36 AM---Digvijay, I can not see anything
> obviously wrong with your configu
t works manually
> but not automatically via zuul as the new patch comes.
>
> Thanks,
> Brij
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Medvedev [mailto:mihail...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 March 2016 20:04
> To: Brijnandan
> Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org;
> zuul:promote 0 0 1
> merger:update 0 0 1
> stop:master.in.ibm.com 0 0 1
> build:dsvm-tempest-full:devstack_slave 0 0 0
> zuul:get_running_jobs 0 0 1
> build:noop-check-communication 0 0 2
> b
Hi Gigvijay,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Digvijay B Ukirde
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am running zuul, zuul merger and Jenkins in one Ubuntu.
> I have configured zuul and zuul merger, Test connection for Jenkins gearman
> plugin also runs successfully.
>
> But whenever patch come, CI is buildin
urther. Let me know if any more inputs
> are required. Thanks in Advance.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Brij
>
Mikhail Medvedev,
IBM
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
related problems, so now I need to wait some time before
being able to test again. I would definitely go the periodic SIGHUP
route if it proves to
work, that is a good idea.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Mikhail Medvedev
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jo
ers,
> Josh
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Mikhail Medvedev
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:57 AM, James E. Blair
>> wrote:
>> > Michael Still writes:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Joshua Hesketh
>> &
reflects zuul-server consumption. The daily bumps on the graph are daily cron
doing log rotation etc, possibly flushing caches.
I can not say 100% that it is still the leak. Could simply be that zuul-server
requires more ram now.
[1]
https://review.openstack.org/#q,I81ee47524cda71a500c55a95a2280f491
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:32 PM, liuxinguo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> There is no need to trigger third party CI if a patch does not pass Jenkins
> Verify.
>
> I think there is a way to reach this but I’m not sure how.
>
>
>
> So is there any reference or suggestion to configure the third party CI to
>
Is OVERRIDE_ZUUL_BRANCH being set to anything, or is it empty? The
error could be explained by it not being set.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Bob Hansen wrote:
> This showed up today after I ran a job to continue to test my 3rd party CI
> system. It appears that the $2 argument is not being pr
] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/231698/
Thank you,
Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)
IBM
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Vinay,
Did you see anything interesting on the gerrit logs? They normally would be
in /home/gerrit2/review_site/logs/. That would be a start. If you use the
same setup as infra team uses, check replication_log.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Vinay Mahuli wrote:
> We have similar setup like
Hi Isaac,
I have added your new account (ibmxi...@il.ibm.com) to the Third-Party CI
gerrit group and have removed the old one. Someone from the Infra team
would still need to deactivate your old gerrit account.
Mikhail Medvedev (irc:mmedvede)
IBM PowerKVM CI
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:58 AM
Hi Xicheng,
Let me know your new gerrit account name and I can add to third-party CI
gerrit group.
thanks,
Mikhail Medvedev (irc:mmedvede)
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 12:55 PM, Xicheng Chang wrote:
> > Hi Lyz,
> >
> > The &qu
Abnishek,
I think you can use DEVSTACK_GATE_PROJECTS_OVERRIDE variable to limit the
projects you want.
Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Abhishek Shrivastava <
abhis...@cloudbyte.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have setup the CI using Ramy's guid
o that image by changing your cache_git_repos.py
[2].
[1]
https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/jenkins/jobs/devstack-gate.yaml#L16-L20
[2]
https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/nodepool/scripts/cache_git_repos.py
cheers,
Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)
Abnishek,
I think you can use DEVSTACK_GATE_PROJECTS_OVERRIDE variable to limit the
projects you want.
Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Abhishek Shrivastava <
abhis...@cloudbyte.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have setup the CI using Ramy's guid
A note - It would take more than just creating "migration" module inside
system-config tree and then running subtree split on it to maintain
history. There were some commits that did not get replicated during
submodule split, for example. For files that moved, it is necessary to use
git filter bran
Hi,
For me:
- would not work: 03:00 UTC -- 12:00 UTC
+ better: 20:00 -- 01:00 UTC
As for having alternating meetings vs. two different meeting times on the
same week, I am leaning towards alternating. I have no strong opinion on
this though.
Thanks,
Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)
On Tue, Dec
28 matches
Mail list logo
