Mike McMullin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 09:55 -0400, James Knott wrote:
>
>> Mike McMullin wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:36 -0400, James Knott wrote:
>>>
>>>
Clayton wrote:
>> I think this definately calls for a conservative approach!
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 09:55 -0400, James Knott wrote:
> Mike McMullin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:36 -0400, James Knott wrote:
> >
> >> Clayton wrote:
> >>
> I think this definately calls for a conservative approach! I'll find a
> different way of moving files between Linu
Mike McMullin wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:36 -0400, James Knott wrote:
Clayton wrote:
I think this definately calls for a conservative approach! I'll find a
different way of moving files between Linux and Windows,
Many thanks to everyone who offered help on this issue.
T
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:36 -0400, James Knott wrote:
> Clayton wrote:
> >> I think this definately calls for a conservative approach! I'll find a
> >> different way of moving files between Linux and Windows,
> >>
> >> Many thanks to everyone who offered help on this issue.
> >
> > The way used to
* John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-10-07 22:07]:
[...]
> In any event, my statement was tongue in cheek, which is why
> it was phrased the way it was, and there is no need to pull
> this thread further off topic to revisit that open wound.
More like "Foot in MOUTH".
IF you weren't *goading*
Clayton wrote:
>> I think this definately calls for a conservative approach! I'll find a
>> different way of moving files between Linux and Windows,
>>
>> Many thanks to everyone who offered help on this issue.
>
> The way used to I do this was relatively simple... My Linux partitions
> are Reiser
Alan Lenton a écrit :
There is the NTFS-3G project http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ that have a stable way
to write to NTFS. I've never been brave enough to try it on any NTFS
partitions, so I cannot vouch for how good this driver really is... maybe
someone here has played with it though, and can comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Andersen wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2007, G T Smith wrote:
>
>> Message was signed with unknown key 0x29CB9A02.
>> The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
>> gpgkeys: key 6AC374B129CB9A02 not found on keyserver
>> G T Smith wrote:
>
>
The way used to I do this was relatively simple... My Linux partitions are
Reiser, my XP partition was NTFS. Linux can read NTFS with no problems...
so on the rare occasion I needed to snag a file from the XP partition, I
can. On the other hand if I happened to be booted to Windows (err..
someth
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2007 09:53
To: opensuse@opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Windows mount is ReadOnly
> I think this definately calls for a conservative approach! I'll find a
> different way of moving files betwee
I think this definately calls for a conservative approach! I'll find a
different way of moving files between Linux and Windows,
Many thanks to everyone who offered help on this issue.
The way used to I do this was relatively simple... My Linux partitions
are Reiser, my XP partition was NTFS.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 May 2007 14:17
To: opensuse@opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Windows mount is ReadOnly
> > | Is it an NTFS drive that you're trying to mount? openSUSE always
> > | mounts
>> NTFS
On Friday 11 May 2007, G T Smith wrote:
> Message was signed with unknown key 0x29CB9A02.
> The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
> gpgkeys: key 6AC374B129CB9A02 not found on keyserver
> G T Smith wrote:
Kmail always puts this at the top of your messages, after grinding
quite a whil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G T Smith wrote:
> Alan Lenton wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 10 May 2007 13:11
>> To: opensuse@opensuse.org
>> Subject: Re: [opensuse] Window
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 13:04 +0100, Alan Lenton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SuSE 10.2 is mounting my Windows file system read only ( fstab shows
> ro,users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0).
^
|--= ReadOnly
Which is the correct default for NTFS partitions on linux.
--
Ken Schneider
UNIX since 1989, linux since
* James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-10-07 09:57]:
[...]
> AFIK, NTFS write support is "experimental". This means that it will
> be about as reliable as writing to it under Windows. ;-)
Touchett :^)
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:55 -0400, James Knott wrote:
> Alan Lenton wrote:
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 10 May 2007 13:11
> > To: opensuse@opensuse.org
> > Subject: Re: [opensuse] Window
On Thursday 10 May 2007, James Knott wrote:
> John Andersen wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 May 2007, Clayton wrote:
> >> Definitely not wise to change from ro. NTFS is not your typical
> >> filesystem, and it's only been recently that Linux has been able to
> >> write to NTFS with any measure of reliab
John Andersen wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2007, Clayton wrote:
>
>> Definitely not wise to change from ro. NTFS is not your typical
>> filesystem, and it's only been recently that Linux has been able to
>> write to NTFS with any measure of reliability.
>>
>
> Of course if the MS/Novell cro
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Clayton wrote:
> Definitely not wise to change from ro. NTFS is not your typical
> filesystem, and it's only been recently that Linux has been able to
> write to NTFS with any measure of reliability.
Of course if the MS/Novell cross license agreement (hiding under the
ban
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Lenton wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 May 2007 13:11
> To: opensuse@opensuse.org
> Subject: Re: [opensuse] Windows mount is ReadOnly
>
>> SuSE 10
Alan Lenton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 May 2007 13:11
To: opensuse@opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Windows mount is ReadOnly
SuSE 10.2 is mounting my Windows file system read only ( fstab shows
ro,users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0
> | Is it an NTFS drive that you're trying to mount? openSUSE always mounts
NTFS formatted partitions as | | ReadOnly.
It is indeed. Do I deduce from this that it isn't wise to change it to
ReadWrite?
Definitely not wise to change from ro. NTFS is not your typical
filesystem, and it's only
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 13:04 +0100, Alan Lenton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SuSE 10.2 is mounting my Windows file system read only ( fstab shows
> ro,users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0).
>
> Is there any reason for this? I want to be able to write files in that
> partition. If that was the case would I need to d
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 May 2007 13:11
To: opensuse@opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Windows mount is ReadOnly
> SuSE 10.2 is mounting my Windows file system read only ( fstab shows
> ro,users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0).
>
>
SuSE 10.2 is mounting my Windows file system read only ( fstab shows
ro,users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0).
Is there any reason for this? I want to be able to write files in that
partition. If that was the case would I need to do anything else except
knock out the 'ro' element?
Is it an NTFS drive
Hi,
SuSE 10.2 is mounting my Windows file system read only ( fstab shows
ro,users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0).
Is there any reason for this? I want to be able to write files in that
partition. If that was the case would I need to do anything else except
knock out the 'ro' element?
alan lenton
-
27 matches
Mail list logo
