-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 13:41, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
>>> Agreed as well..
>> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the
>> distro"?
>>
> I think this question is r
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
>> Agreed as well..
> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
>
I think this question is related to our project policies, not just to
PolarSSL support. Do we want to try to protect packagers and
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
> On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote:
> > So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
> 1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro!
Ok - so I'll ACK the patch Alon has posted as well. Thanks.
>
On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro!
>
> (How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like
> to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the buildslav
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
> Agreed as well..
So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
(How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like
to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the buildslaves, without
Agreed as well..
On 7-6-2012 11:42, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
>> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re:
I'd go for >= 1.1.4
Since 1.1.2 does not handle empty packets correctly.
On 7-6-2012 11:35, Frank de Brabander wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
> security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
> 1.1.1.
>
> On 07-06-12 11:24, "S
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:35:58AM +0200, Frank de Brabander wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
> security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
> 1.1.1.
If the PolarSSL author says so, we should follow :-)
> >I noticed that
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
>> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?
>>
>> Maybe t
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?
>
> Maybe this should actually be chang
Hello,
Build system should only care about the interface, not the "quality"
of the dependency.
So if we are built OK with >=1.1.0 than this should be the boundary.
Thanks,
Alon.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Frank de Brabander
wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since t
> -Original Message-
> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:33
> To: Samuli Seppänen
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM,
Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
1.1.1.
On 07-06-12 11:24, "Samuli Seppänen" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL
>1.1.0 failed build duri
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL
> 1.1.0 failed build during the configure phase:
>
> checking polarssl version... configure: error: invalid polarssl version
>
> Updating to PolarSSL 1.1.1 or l
Hi,
I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL
1.1.0 failed build during the configure phase:
checking polarssl version... configure: error: invalid polarssl version
Updating to PolarSSL 1.1.1 or later solves this issue. However, commit
1d92d06dca5ac says "Removed su
15 matches
Mail list logo