Inode said:
> Hi all,
> I'm looking on the net for a tunnel driver for windows. Anyone found a
> good working driver? I have to user OpenVPN from an OpenBSD and a
> Windows, and OpenBSD (native) doesn't support TAP device...
Yes, this is a problem. For OpenBSD to talk to Windows over OpenVPN,
James:
Are you aware of a Windows tun project? While most windows users may
prefer tap, I am interested in the point-to-point nature of the tun
device. When setting up many routed connections, it seems that each TAP
connection will use 1 ip and waste 2 others. I can also live without
broadcast traf
Bert Shuler said:
> James:
> Are you aware of a Windows tun project? While most windows users may
> prefer tap, I am interested in the point-to-point nature of the tun
> device. When setting up many routed connections, it seems that each TAP
> connection will use 1 ip and waste 2 others. I can al
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote:
> Yes, this is a problem. For OpenBSD to talk to Windows over OpenVPN, we need
> either a tun driver for Windows or a tap driver for OpenBSD.
>
> My guess is that the easier and better solution would be to solve the tap on
> OpenBSD problem, rather than th
Matthias Andree said:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is a problem. For OpenBSD to talk to Windows over OpenVPN, we
> > need
> > either a tun driver for Windows or a tap driver for OpenBSD.
> >
> > My guess is that the easier and better solution would be to solve the
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote:
> > I'd like to challenge the "better" claim:
>
> I mean "better" only in the sense of simpler configuration -- i.e. not needing
> to set up a WINS server to make cross-subnet browsing work. I agree that tun
> is more scalable, secure, etc.
After being th
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote:
> While I do believe that the majority of Windows users will prefer a tap
> interface, I say this simply because in my experience _most_ Windows users
> prefer the option that is the easiest to configure. Once you stop
> automatically routing broadcasts and
Matthias Andree said:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote:
>
> > While I do believe that the majority of Windows users will prefer a tap
> > interface, I say this simply because in my experience _most_ Windows users
> > prefer the option that is the easiest to configure. Once you stop
> >
