Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] routerstation and madwifi

2009-06-29 Thread David A . Bandel
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:42, Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote: On Sunday 28 June 2009 19:08:10 David A. Bandel wrote: Vasilis, Well,  in 16603 neither compression off nor backing out 434 works (or so it seems).  I'm open to more suggestions. David- Hi David, Trying backing out r15949 patch.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package: nginx

2009-06-29 Thread Benjamin Cama
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 22:12 +0200, Benjamin Cama a écrit : > +define Package/nginx > + SECTION:=custom > + CATEGORY:=Custom Mmmhhh forgot to change that to: + SECTION:=net + CATEGORY:=Network --- benjamin ___ openwrt-devel mailing list ope

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package: nginx

2009-06-29 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, I just wrote a Makefile + patches to compile nginx ( http://nginx.net/ ) for openwrt. It is quite basic for now (no init scripts, no openwrt-specific config file), and has some hardcoded requirement, but should run ok for those wanting to experiment with it. The "hardcoded" requirements are f

[OpenWrt-Devel] NuWiki meeting thursday @ 20:00 CEST

2009-06-29 Thread Gregers Petersen
Hello NuWiki'ans and interested people This is the call for the 1th NuWiki development meeting, please check the agenda at -> http://nuwiki.openwrt.org/meta/ircmeeting Chz -- Gregers Petersen Relationship manager, layer 8 and anthropology momu.dk/blog/ glp on irc ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] About Atmel at91

2009-06-29 Thread Hamish Guthrie
Hi Tian, I got an old board with u-boot(1.0.0) and linux(2.4.19) binaries and documents. Which board do you have? Is it one of the Atmel evaluation boards? I can download u-boot and linux binaries to the board through serial and it works, but documents are not very detailed, do not mention

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] About Atmel at91

2009-06-29 Thread hamish
Great. I tried r14800 that can be compiled, but I don't know how to modify u-boot that the board uses. On at91rm9200, the boot process is a little complex, but is described here: http://www.open-research.org.uk/ARMuC/At91rm9200_Booting.html Does your board already boot, or are you trying to br

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] About Atmel at91

2009-06-29 Thread Tian HongPeng
ham...@prodigi.ch 写道: >> Hello, >> I am working with an Atmel at91RM9200-based board, and I am new to at91, >> cannot make Target System(Atmel AT91) work. >> >> target/linux/at91/image/dfboot and target/linux/at91/image/u-boot >> confused me a lot. >> >> Any suggestions about 9200, 9260, 9261 are

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] About Atmel at91

2009-06-29 Thread hamish
Hello, I am working with an Atmel at91RM9200-based board, and I am new to at91, cannot make Target System(Atmel AT91) work. target/linux/at91/image/dfboot and target/linux/at91/image/u-boot confused me a lot. Any suggestions about 9200, 9260, 9261 are welcome. Currently the bootloaders for a

[OpenWrt-Devel] About Atmel at91

2009-06-29 Thread Tian HongPeng
Hello, I am working with an Atmel at91RM9200-based board, and I am new to at91, cannot make Target System(Atmel AT91) work. target/linux/at91/image/dfboot and target/linux/at91/image/u-boot confused me a lot. Any suggestions about 9200, 9260, 9261 are welcome. Thanks in advance, Tian Hongpeng

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] routerstation and madwifi

2009-06-29 Thread Vasilis Tsiligiannis
On Sunday 28 June 2009 19:08:10 David A. Bandel wrote: > Vasilis, > > Well, in 16603 neither compression off nor backing out 434 works (or so it > seems). I'm open to more suggestions. > > David- Hi David, Trying backing out r15949 patch. Btw, do you have access to the serial console? Regard

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Note for mips/mipsel targets running trunk

2009-06-29 Thread bud . dhay
Thanks for pointing out ... bud Hi, Since changesets 16606 and 16607 we have switched to using software floating point emulation in the toolchain and we disabled the in-kernel FPU Emulator in the MIPS kernel by default. The rationale behind this is : - the FPU emulator of the kernel is slow an

[OpenWrt-Devel] Note for mips/mipsel targets running trunk

2009-06-29 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hi, Since changesets 16606 and 16607 we have switched to using software floating point emulation in the toolchain and we disabled the in-kernel FPU Emulator in the MIPS kernel by default. The rationale behind this is : - the FPU emulator of the kernel is slow and works by catching floating poin