Hello community,
Greetings.
OPNFV Bay Area User Group will have our meetup this Friday Feb 10th. Please
check our event site [1] for details of this meetup.
In this meetup, some good topics will be presented and discussed, such as:
- Serverless Unikernel VNF Orchestration (by Ericsson
Adding the link for the updates of HA API docs. Please review the patch before
the meeting so that we can have an efficient discussion.
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/26663/
-邮件原件-
发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代
You can reference the info collected on the Models wiki:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models/References, and on the Functest wiki at
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/List+Of+VNFs
As part of the objective of the Models project, we are building a list of VNFs
that meet the following crit
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ATTENDEE;
Hi, all. Below are the logistic for this week's project meeting. According to
Yuan Yue's suggestion, we will try zoom this time. Please check out the
following link before head and see if you need to download the zoom software.
Hope this will work out fine.
Agenda:
1, yardstick's current work a
Aaron,
OK, I added that topic in today’s agenda for Doctor meeting.
Talk to you soon,
Ryota
From: Aaron Smith [mailto:aasm...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:06 AM
To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太)
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further d
Hi Yardstick team,
Sorry I was late for today's working meeting.
Yujun send an email to answer Yardstick's questions about this integration[1].
Maybe some committers and contributors missed this email.
Hope we can reach a final decision in the end of this week.
Thanks!
[1]
https:
Clarification: “no more development activity for Danube release features”. That
does not mean however that features which are targeted to work on Danube cannot
continue to be developed, just that per the convention they are not part of the
“release”.
Due to issues with the late availability of
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
E
Team,
There seems to be some misunderstanding about the Danube release status.
I've had people email me with comments about continuing to integrate with
other scenarios or installers, or enabling additional features, etc.
To be clear, we are past Milestone 5, which means that features are frozen
Hi Ryota,
I think this is a good plan. We can start the discussion in the Doctor
meeting and continue on the "Polling vs Event capture” if needed.
Maybe also start the discussion on what might be the architecture for a
monitoring / notification framework. Not necessarily
including or not inclu
Mark demonstrated a pretty test coverage report in last testperf
meeting[1]. And we want to have similar report in QTIP.
I have implemented the coverage test in QTIP verify job[2]. I wonder what
will be the next step to generate such diagram in jenkins.
@Mark, do you have a brief how-to document
Great, thanks! As I mentioned before, @Zhihui will be the representative
for QTIP on this topic.
I'm sorry for the absence of tomorrow's meeting, dealing with some personal
emergency, and will be out of office next week also. I have expressed most
of my points in mailing list and will continue fo
merged
-Original Message-
From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 19:55 PM
To: Jose Lausuch
Cc: Mark Beierl; morgan richomme; OPNFV Tech Discussion
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][apex] functest container not
updating
OK it looks like we
Hi All,
the Bare Metal POD in the OPNFV Huawei Munich Lab will be unavailable due to
the overtempeature. The huawei-pod5 will have problem in the Jenkins, but The
virtual POD and other servers still can be used.
I will fix this problem as soon as possible.
Please back any data you feel is crit
Hi,
Of course, I’m interested in such topic. The problem is I cannot join Barometer
meeting as it would be 2 AM in my time zone… I hope someone can take notes.
Doctor project is still candidate to have such discussion. And I’m open to add
them to our meeting agenda. How about having “Polling v
16 matches
Mail list logo
