https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
Dan Callaghan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer ---
The explicit requires on gtk3 is IMHO unwarranted, since rpm already detect it
fine.
I also do not see why the main rpm requires vala, since that's a run time
library.
The same goes for gobject-introspect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
Dan Mashal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
--- Comment #26 from MartinKG ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tntnet
Short Description: A web application server for web applications.
Owners: martinkg
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
Add64-1.2.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Add64-1.2.2-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
Dan Callaghan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #33 from Dan Cal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830155
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
unlambda-0.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
man2html-1.6-8.g.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
saslwrapper-0.16-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
saslwrapper-0.16-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #6 from Jef Spaleta ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Let me be clear, I'm not currently working towards packaging "unity" so I don't
see the point of a tracker bug.
My first goal is to get libunity packaged, as its libunity that applic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
--- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson ---
Thank you for being so thorough. It helps when I have so many of these that I
am working on.
ridealong - That should be having a review request in by the end of the week.
Ridealong also has it it's own selinu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756465
Lucian Langa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwiz...@gmail.com
Component|Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #5 from Jef Spaleta ---
sorry about that guys. added the one missing BR.
mock f17 run completes without error now for me
mock rawhide run completes without error now for me
ive pushed corrected spec and srpms to the same url with th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer ---
And it need to have a systemd file, I could write one but I am not sure.
Stickshift-broker should be started separately, with a separate apache +
passenger ( + mod_ssl ) instance running on port 8080 ?
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer ---
Also, can the unit test be run in %check ( and so that would require rcov at
built time) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #1 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722713
Mauricio Cleveland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|16 |17
--- Comment #24 from Mauricio Cl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Gerard Rya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Tested on Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4329789
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
--- Comment #3 from Gerard Ryan ---
Fixed! :)
Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1.0-3/jhighlight.spec
SRPM URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1.0-3/jhighlight-1.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842013
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py build
Error importing numpy - Make sure numpy is installed
seems numpy is missing :)
In fact to make it build, I have added the following ( setup.py check runtime
deps at build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer ---
Btw, could a tracker bug be added, so we can see the progression of unity
packaging ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796953
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
genders-1.18-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
genders-1.18-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841766
Bug 841766 depends on bug 652629, which changed state.
Bug 652629 Summary: Review Request: erlang-riak_kv - Riak Key/Value Store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652629
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #6 from Gerard Ryan ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The LICENSE file must be included in the SRPM and installed as %doc.
> This is required by the point 4. of the license.
It's already being installed as %doc, and by extension is incl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #30 from Dan Mashal ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mate-corba
Short Description: CORBA Object Request Broker for MATE Desktop
Owners: vicodan rdieter
Branches: f16 f17
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #29 from Rex Die
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
*** APPROVED ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
jbossxb-2.0.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbossxb-2.0.3-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
>rpmlint maven-script-interpreter-1.0-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
>maven-script-interpreter.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
>>beanshell -> bean shell, bean-shell, beans hell
>1 packages and 0 specfi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from gil ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
--- Comment #32 from Nelson Marques ---
Dan,
I don't know what to do from here, and this what I did:
- on pkgdb retired the package;
- removed myself from all groups I was subscrived (packaging, CLA, etc);
- filed a ticket with infra-structu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843153
Bug ID: 843153
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824052
Liang Suilong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(liangsuilong@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824061
Liang Suilong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(liangsuilong@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||843133
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
FTBFS in Rawhide. Appears to be a D compiler problem:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8950/4328950/build.log
+ ldc2 avgtime.d
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1/../../../../lib64/libp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
avgtime-0-0.1.git20120724.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avgtime-0-0.1.git20120724.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749673
Krzysztof Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jerb...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842197
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requireme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
will-crash-0.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/will-crash-0.2-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784
Bug 830784 depends on bug 830933, which changed state.
Bug 830933 Summary: maven2 needs to provide maven-artifact as a subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830933
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars-0.1.1-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #4 from Gerard Ryan ---
Bundled jars removed from the source zip in the srpm so that the terms of their
licenses are not violated
Spec URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/maven-indexer/4.1.2-2/maven-indexer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
Niels de Vos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nde...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842013
--- Comment #4 from Steve Dickson ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Build in mock fail :
>
> Exécution_de(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E1njxS
> + umask 022
> + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
> + cd nfsometer-1.1
> + LANG=C
> + export LANG
> + uns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215
Bug 746215 depends on bug 809142, which changed state.
Bug 809142 Summary: mod_perl fails to rebuild in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809142
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: (Rename |Review Request: (Rename
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes, that thing on my page is not clear enough - the initial release of
> python-django-authopenid package should have already been 4, because the
> release of obsoleted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Niels, please take ownership of review BZs. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841001
--- Comment #4 from raveit65 ---
a few suggestions :)
1. You have double entries of BuildRequires !
2. A empty row before %changelog would be nice.
3. We need only this as BuildRequires
BuildRequires: glib2-devel
BuildRequires: gtk2-devel
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
--- Comment #1 from Gerard Ryan ---
The lgpl text that was in this package, not from the tarball, has been removed.
Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1.0-2/jhighlight.spec
SRPM URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
Richard Marko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> - Probably just a typo: Your VR is 1.0.1-1, but you obsolete
> django-authopenid < 1.0.1-4. That should be 1.0.1-1, right?
Hey Bohuslav,
Not sure about this:
The djang
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
