https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
--- Comment #10 from Björn Esser ---
rpmlint shows:
* binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
* unused-direct-shlib-dependency
is still there.
For your sed-magic on libtool to work on this you must add:
+BuildRequires: libtool
%prep
%setup -q
+a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446
Fridolín Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fpoko...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch ---
Gil, I'm still wondering, why don't you package it just as a gem (see comment
#4). What is the point of keeping the maven stuff and -javadoc subpackages
around? They are not distributed with the gem version as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916087
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916087
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
cloud-initramfs-tools-0.20-0.3.bzr85.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cloud-initramfs-tools-0.20-0.3.bzr85.fc18
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446
--- Comment #4 from Fridolín Pokorný ---
Manual review was done, all manual review passes should be marked as "[x]"
(passed). Sorry for that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OZvZKtHOia&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963077
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963077
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gTDqmS5TB1&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
Flags|fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966139
Bug ID: 966139
Summary: Review Request: easy-rsa - Simple shell based CA
utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Adam Jackson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966163
Bug ID: 966163
Summary: Review Request: dans-gdal-scripts - Utilities for use
in conjunction with GDAL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966139
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||965999
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965443
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965443
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JVzyXjbVVA&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng ---
Why should I
+Requires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa}
+Requires: lfcxml-devel%{?_isa}
Any reason?
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Adam Jackson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
--- Comment #5 from Timothy St. Clair ---
Looking at 2.0.5, it appears to be a testing only dependency (possibly for
compatibility). It appears we may be able to prune the dependency entirely as
we track forward progress a bit closer.
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git setup complete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UoLTs02WIh&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962160
--- Comment #9 from Johan Cwiklinski ---
I've removed config file in /etc/iipsrv, and placed its content in unit file.
New version:
Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/iipsrv/iipsrv.spec
SRPM URL:
http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/iipsrv/iip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: xorg-x11-glamor
Owners: glisse airlied xgl-maint
Branches: f18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=c0aUYAISIZ&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: xorg-x11-glamor
Owners: glisse airlied xgl-maint
New Branches: f18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #13)
> Gil, I'm still wondering, why don't you package it just as a gem (see
> comment #4). What is the point of keeping the maven stuff and -javadoc
> subpackages around
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927269
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Note corrected formatting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bxlP9jQDzt&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966156
Bug ID: 966156
Summary: Review Request: prwd - A tool can print reduced
working directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871018
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871018
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-hk2-2.1.93-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-hk2-2.1.93-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858127
Matthew Farrellee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957337
Matthew Farrellee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966201
Bug ID: 966201
Summary: Review Request: tnftp - FTP (File Transfer Protocol)
client from NetBSD
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966221
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||966223
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966222
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||966223
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cristian.ciupitu@ |
|yahoo.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
--- Comment #12 from Björn Esser ---
`grep -R -e"lfc*/"` on devel-pkg reveals:
usr/include/cego/CegoFieldValue.h:#include
usr/include/cego/CegoField.h:#include
usr/include/cego/CegoField.h:#include
usr/include/cego/CegoAdmNet.h:#include
usr/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966221
Bug ID: 966221
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-require-all - Require all files
within a directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966222
Bug ID: 966222
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-bignumber.js - Library for
decimal and non-decimal arithmetic
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275
--- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert ---
Thank you for your comments. Many of the issues you bring up are valid for
packages intended for Fedora only. This package is intended to be built also
for EPEL 5 and later. Some of the changes you suggest r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
pngquant-1.8.3-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pngquant-1.8.3-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966223
Bug ID: 966223
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-mysql - pure node.js MySQL
client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966223
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||966221, 966222
--- Comment #1 from Troy Da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Björn Esser from comment #1)
> * `BuildRoot: ...` and `rm -rf %{buildroot}` is obsoleted
Also this package is intended for EPEL 5.
> * use `%make_install` instead `make install DESTDIR=...`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915006
Panos Polychronis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panospolychro...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905255
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927611
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
pyode-1.2.0-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858061
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867282
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858077
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870996
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871018
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961445
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915006
--- Comment #21 from Kevin Kofler ---
perl(version) is provided by perl-version, not perl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SCSoLo3j6X
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #33 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895810
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
--- Comment #22 from Robin Lee ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #21)
> Git setup complete.
Jon, it seems you used to change fedora-cvs to '+', not just remove the flag.
Any mistake?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951777
Bug 951777 depends on bug 952851, which changed state.
Bug 952851 Summary: Branch python-pyquery for el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952851
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951777
Bug 951777 depends on bug 952851, which changed state.
Bug 952851 Summary: Branch python-pyquery for el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952851
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
--- Comment #23 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Robin Lee from comment #22)
> (In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #21)
> > Git setup complete.
>
> Jon, it seems you used to change fedora-cvs to '+', not just remove the
> flag. Any mistak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #24 from Chri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng ---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.6-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
monitorix-3.2.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/monitorix-3.2.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966324
Bug ID: 966324
Summary: Review Request: codecrypt -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966324
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: codecrypt - |Review Request: codecrypt -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
monitorix-3.2.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/monitorix-3.2.0-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877607
--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert ---
Race condition fixed.
This package is intended for EPEL 5 too, so the buildroot tag and cleaning of
the buildroot in %install are intentional.
New package version:
Spec URL: http://grid.tsl.uu.se/review/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
lfcbase-1.5.4-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lfcbase-1.5.4-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
77 matches
Mail list logo