https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126620
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|cmap-gb1-5-2010.10.30-4.fc2 |cmap-gb1-5-2010.10.30-4.fc1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128409
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||gmsh-2.8.5-2.fc20
Resolu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126620
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126617
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Bug 505154 depends on bug 294, which changed state.
Bug 294 Summary: Review Request: engrid - Mesh generation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|cv-0.4.1-4.fc19 |cv-0.4.1-4.fc20
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|cmap-cns1-6-2010.10.26-3.fc |cmap-cns1-6-2010.10.26-3.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071554
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104476
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||python-wsgilog-0.3-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128145
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126622
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|cmap-identity0-2010.10.26-3 |cmap-identity0-2010.10.26-3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086406
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126622
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127169
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from David Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #3 from Helber Maciel Guerra ---
Follow Erik recommendation:
I change package name just to atom.
Spec URL: http://www.hmg.eti.br/static/rpm/atom.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.hmg.eti.br/static/rpm/atom-0.123.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
RPMs to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #2 from Helber Maciel Guerra ---
(In reply to Erik Schilling from comment #1)
> Just a random question: Why not simply call it "atom"?
>
> At least for me it more sounded like a nodejs package while it is in fact a
> full applicat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.el5 |tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.el6
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895479
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114212
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
glite-lb-server-3.0.18-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||ikiwiki-3.20140613-2.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-pecl-fann-1.0.7-1.fc19 |php-pecl-fann-1.0.7-1.el6
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.00 |perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.00
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.fc2 |tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.el5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060910
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|uid_wr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060906
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|socket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583301
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
--- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583301
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
el5 and el6 already exist.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Booth ---
There are a couple of blockers in there, but very easy to fix. Great work,
thanks!
The automated tests would be extremely nice to have. However, if you really
can't make it work it's not a blocker. If not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Booth ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
--- Comment #15 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
And the list does get the notifications, cool! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583301
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
--- Comment #44 from pjp ---
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121082
--- Comment #6 from František Dvořák ---
1) there is still a problem with the license:
In this case we should also include local copy of the license text, because
this MIT variant requires it:
"The above copyright notice and this permission
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790
--- Comment #19 from Petr Šabata ---
I find the %description a little confusing -- at first I wasn't quite sure what
the difference between your "utilities" and "programs" was and kept looking for
binaries which weren't there. Perhaps some re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129889
--- Comment #5 from Adam Miller ---
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/fig.spec
SRPM URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/fig-0.5.2-2.fc22.src.rpm
CFLAGS dropped
properly versioned the python macros, sorry for the oversight
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
Matthew Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074128
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jamielinux@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
Matthew Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mbo...@redhat.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080
--- Comment #5 from Josef Stribny ---
Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/obs/rubygem-sprite-factory.spec
SRPM URL:
http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/obs/rubygem-sprite-factory-1.6.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
Unfortunately it was worse than I expe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Erik Schilling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ablu.erikschilling@googlema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066573
--- Comment #16 from Ralph Bean ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #15)
> Can this be noted somewhere? Most people, like me, will probably use root
> login to configure the server. :D
I'm not sure where to put it in a pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from gil ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Micha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121082
--- Comment #5 from Josef Stribny ---
Ok, I asked upstream to include it[1]. I would include this link above the
source in the spec file before pushing. Anything else?
[1] https://github.com/tomykaira/clockwork/pull/117
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/json-path.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/json-path-0.9.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
- disable failed tests on java 8
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
--- Comment #1 from Michael Rice ---
I added the FE-NEEDSPONSOR because its been a few years since I was an active
package maintainer, and it looked like I was no longer sponsored.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
Michael Rice changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971
Bug ID: 1132971
Summary: Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python
SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to
manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter
Product: Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý ---
rubygem-sprite-factory.spec:69: W: deprecated-grep [u'egrep']
Direct use of grep as egrep or fgrep is deprecated in GNU grep and historical
in POSIX, use grep -E and grep -F instead.
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Hmm still:
+ ruby -rminitest/autorun -rrubygems -Ilib:test -
+ egrep '43 runs, 21. assertions, 3 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips.*'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
group::infra-sig got the watch* acls just fine on pkgdb2 it looks like:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-flask-xml-rpc/
I'll import the srpm and see if the mailing list gets the n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128384
--- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny ---
Thanks for the informal review.
> Package doesn't match the upstream:
Did you compare it with the right released tag (2.2.1)[1] or with master? I
didn't do any modifications to those files. I added this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
See if the group::thing works. It warned me that it's not a valid fas
account, so if it does work we'll need to patch the script to account for
that.
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936
--- Comment #1 from Michal Srb ---
Hmm, the package doesn't build in Rawhide due to test failures:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7438760
expected:<[{"o[ccupation":"Farm boy","name":"Luke Skywalker","aliases":["Nerf
herde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Added f21.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791263
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791263
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720085
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720086
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720086
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720085
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566962
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566962
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|opensou...@till.name|
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044
--- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla ---
Branch exists.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121082
--- Comment #4 from František Dvořák ---
(In reply to Josef Stribny from comment #3)
> > 2) missing man-pages: packagers should work with upstream to add them, but
> > it
> > is not strictly required by guidelines
>
> Yes, that would be nic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952
--- Comment #43 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241101
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo