https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974821
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-129979e3d0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974821
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-416b9c5497 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978861
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2a0d2167b3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975535
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d649286d51 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974431
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0202a62e17 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977799
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2ee5364fa3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2ee5364
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977799
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-30590b552a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977799
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-31aafe39f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-31aafe3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977799
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e2ae2d06e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981994
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981993
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0ec38382f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046
Ben Boeckel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Ben Boeckel has canceled Package Review
's request for Ben Boeckel
's needinfo:
Bug 1256046: Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local
events and do actions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985116
Bug ID: 1985116
Summary: Review Request: wildmatch - C/C++ library for
git/rsync-style pattern matching
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985108
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pbrobin...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985108
Bug ID: 1985108
Summary: Review Request: python-rpm-head-signing - Small python
module to extract RPM header and file digests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
--- Comment #7 from Otto Urpelainen ---
(In reply to Christopher Engelhard from comment #5)
> New build. fedora-review will now probably complain about
> /usr/share/php/League being also owned by other php-league-* packages. This
> is expected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
Otto Urpelainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985021
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984192
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35852
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984192
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985036
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72415364
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985036
Bug ID: 1985036
Summary: Review Request: libart - Adaptive Radix Trees
implemented in C
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984191
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-serde_bser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984192
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-watchman_client
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Engelhard ---
Looking good!
Just two more things:
- the %files section is missing %dir %{_datadir}/guile/site/%{mver}
(/usr/share/guile/site/3.0 still has no owner)
- your patch for the chroot thing seems to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! The disttag thing is a side effect of using rpmautospec:
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/417 The texinfo thing looks like a
bug in fedora-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985021
Bug ID: 1985021
Summary: Review Request: python-tomli - A little TOML parser
for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041
--- Comment #7 from Ben Beasley ---
I’ve updated this to build from the latest grpc source (1.39.0). The
python-xds-protos version number is unchanged, as are the commit hashes of the
additional sources.
There’s a version 0.0.10 on PyPI, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984451
Didik Supriadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxcvt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342
--- Comment #8 from Olivier Fourdan ---
repo request https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35846
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672601
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672601
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Valena ---
I've fixed the Spec file and updated links in Description.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672601
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306
--- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libyang2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984078
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/CFR
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984419
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-charset-normalizer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306
--- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601
Tomas Korbar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tkor...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
I forgot also netperf.service systemd file should be provided for easy running
of netserver. It can be used also without it, but would simplify testing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #12)
> This is because I changed redhat-rpm-config in F35+ to fix it:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/
> e0cfcc0fc76a7642faabb25c5e348d6a1314a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984451
Didik Supriadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
Christopher Engelhard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(c...@lcts.de) |
--- Comment #5 from Christ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975845
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984419
--- Comment #7 from Lumír Balhar ---
> I guess this is not primarily an application despite having one, right?
> Would users try to dnf install normalizer?
Your guess is correct. Because this package is a replacement for chardet, which
also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976481
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1975845
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975845
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968655
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984793
Bug ID: 1984793
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-cpmfile - Parse cpmfile
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984793
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1984246
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984419
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
One extra thing I figured after the review:
The package currently has no runtime requires. But it might have some in the
future. And since you run tests in %check, I recommend using
%pyproject_buildrequire
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984419
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984419
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
New Python packaging guidelines:
Open questions:
[?] Packages that primarily provide applications, services or any kind of
executables SHOULD be named according to the general Fedora naming guidelines
(e.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984419
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923830
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Diffuse - |Review Request: diffuse -
60 matches
Mail list logo