https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
seafile-5.1.2-3.fc24, seafile-client-5.1.1-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora
24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
seafile-5.1.2-3.fc24 seafile-client-5.1.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6aa664154f
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #21 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
seafile-5.1.2-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6aa664154f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/seafile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review- |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review-
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #17 from Nikos Roussos ---
I fixed the license.
SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec
SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-5.1.2-3.fc24.src.rpm
For the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #16 from Julien Enselme ---
- Seafile is license under GPLv2 not v3 (this is blocking)
- Did you manage to get more information on unused-direct-shlib-dependency?
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #15 from Nikos Roussos ---
Thanks. I fixed the error with the shared libraries. The
"unused-direct-shlib-dependency" warning, judging from what rpmlint -I says,
seems to be an upstream linking problem, so I'll open a bug upstream.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #14 from Julien Enselme ---
> and this weird error:
> seafile-devel.x86_64: E: non-devel-file-in-devel-package
> /usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0.0.0
This comes from the fact that
/usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0
/usr/lib64/libseafile.so.0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #13 from Nikos Roussos ---
I'm not entirely sure to be honest about the warning. I can't find much
relevant documentation around.
seafile.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
and this weird error:
seafile-devel.x86_64: E: non-de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #12 from Julien Enselme ---
> I'm still trying to figure out a couple of things regarding the shared
> libraries.
Are those things blocking for the review or can I continue now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #11 from Nikos Roussos ---
New spec update to latest upstream
SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec
SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-5.1.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
Most issues are resolved. I'm st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #10 from Julien Enselme ---
> these are already installed both on buildroot and on runtime since they are
> pulled as dependencies of other dependencies (ccnet and libsearpc).
I think you should put them anyway: one of the depend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #9 from Nikos Roussos ---
Trying to address the issues pointed out in the review. Some
comments/questions.
> Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> According to http://manual.seafile.com/build_seafile/server.html, the
> f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #8 from Julien Enselme ---
Any plan on continuing the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #7 from Julien Enselme ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #6 from Nikos Roussos ---
Update to 5.0.5
SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec
SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-5.0.5-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Bug 1160671 depends on bug 1129429, which changed state.
Bug 1129429 Summary: Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked
applications in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #4 from Nikos Roussos ---
Update to 4.1.4
SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec
SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-4.1.4-1.fc21.src.rpm
Also address some things from above comment:
2. Us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Stackov ---
(In reply to Nikos Roussos from comment #2)
> Thanks. I'll check all these in detail. Just a quick reply on comment 2.
> This is not a snapshot, but guidelines suggest I reference the source by
> commit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Roussos ---
Thanks. I'll check all these in detail. Just a quick reply on comment 2. This
is not a snapshot, but guidelines suggest I reference the source by commit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Vladimir Stackov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amigo.el...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1160672
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1129429
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
31 matches
Mail list logo
