https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #30 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Just want to redirect people to
https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/686#issuecomment-87199448 which has the
latest updates of the wip rpm with links.
I guess it would be great if people could leav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Bug 1169966 depends on bug 1174030, which changed state.
Bug 1174030 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-appc-spec - Schema defs and
tools for app container specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174030
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Iago López changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@endocode.com
--- Comment #29 from I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #28 from Daniel Walsh ---
Ok, we should do this i nthe start of the daemon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #27 from Colin Walters ---
You want to do it on start, not in %post, because otherwise a new systemd or
glibc RPM would require "yum reinstall rocket" or the like, which would be
awkward (and wouldn't work on Atomic).
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #26 from Daniel Walsh ---
Awesome.
Lokesh just have Rocket require supermin, and then run supermin in post install
or in its init file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #25 from Colin Walters ---
It's already a separate tool. Just need to patch rocket to use it on startup.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #24 from Daniel Walsh ---
Sounds like a great solution. can we break supermin out of kibguestfs, or just
make Rocket require it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Colin Walters changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||walt...@redhat.com
--- Comment #23 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #21)
> If I'm reading this right, this option still _does not_ allow me to include
> the fedora image in the srpm but leave it to the user to fetch it, co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #21 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #20)
> 1) Add a README.fedora that points to the latest Fedora image and let the
> user figure it out AND/OR Include a script to download the latest Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
I don't think that mkrootfs.sh is going to work.
A) There is no networking in the koji runtime instances, so it can't download
anything, even from koji.
B) Including that binary image into the SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #19 from Kushal Das ---
# rkt fetch
https://github.com/coreos/etcd/releases/download/v0.5.0-alpha.4/etcd-v0.5.0-alpha.4-linux-amd64.aci
Downloading aci: [=== ] 3.01 MB/6.78
MB
sha256-6635e9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #17 from Kushal Das ---
I think you will have to open a FESCo ticket CCing rel-eng for the same. I
guess they block these accesses due to security reasons.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #16 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Kushal Das from comment #15)
> (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #14)
>
> >
> > Not sure yet if koji will find the koji base image via the URL, else it'll
> > have to be include
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #15 from Kushal Das ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #14)
>
> Not sure yet if koji will find the koji base image via the URL, else it'll
> have to be included in the SRPM itself.
You will have to include it in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #14 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
%changelog
* Sun Dec 14 2014 Lokesh Mandvekar - 0.1.1-1
- use upstream v0.1.1
- mkrootfs uses fedora docker base image from koji
via Václav Pavlin
Spec URL: https://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rocket/rock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1148704 |1174030
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Bug 1169966 depends on bug 1148704, which changed state.
Bug 1148704 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto -
Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #13 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Timothy St. Clair from comment #12)
> As I had mentioned:
>
> An important point to clarify is that two things were announced:
>
> 1. a spec (App Container)
> https://github.com/coreos/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #12 from Timothy St. Clair ---
As I had mentioned:
An important point to clarify is that two things were announced:
1. a spec (App Container)
https://github.com/coreos/rocket/blob/master/app-container/SPEC.md
2. and an implement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #11 from Matthew Miller ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #7)
> Maybe we could try a fedora rootfs instead, but no idea how well that'd
> work, also gotta check with upstream about that (if we're to pursue that
> optio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #10 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Tomas Tomecek from comment #9)
> Wanted to give rocket a shot, so I made your spec a source of information;
> couple points:
>
> * latest build of go-bindata is 0.0.6, while your spec re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Tomas Tomecek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ttome...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #7 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #6)
> Do I want to know why this package needs an entire prebuilt PXE image of
> another Linux distribution?
From what I've gathered as yet, the rkt (stage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Miller ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #4)
> I think
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-
> built_binaries_or_libraries applies to the PXE image in Source1
Err, yes. Tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #4 from Dan Hor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1148704
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
init is installed in %{_libexecdir}/rocket/stage1 as per issue URL in Comment
1.
Spec and SRPM updated, links are same as in Comment 0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #1 from Kushal Das ---
I opened https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/173 for the 'init' binary
name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
37 matches
Mail list logo
