https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Bug 1246199 depends on bug 1246192, which changed state.
Bug 1246192 Summary: Review Request: python-pymod2pkg - python module to
package map
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246192
What|Removed |A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
mpr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #20 from mpr...@redhat.com ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rdopkg. You may modify the branch "f26"
in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rdopkg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|needinfo?(hgue.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hgue...@redhat.com |karlthe...@gmail.com
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hgue...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #16 from Neal Gompa ---
Looks good to me at this point. That said, Haikel needs actually do the
approval. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
W: file-size-mismatch rdopkg-0.45.0.tar.gz
is a one time issue due to .spec being included in tarball and I regenerated
that without updating PyPI version. Once reviewd, .spec will move to fedora
distgit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg/master/rdopkg.spec
SRPM URL: https://jruzicka.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rdopkg-0.45.0-3.fc25.src.rpm
Note this package built success
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #12)
> > I wanted to wait until it's supported in latest EL to avoid %if but OK,
> > I'll pave the way ;)
>
> I'm not sure how it could get supported in EL7, since R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
> I wanted to wait until it's supported in latest EL to avoid %if but OK, I'll
> pave the way ;)
I'm not sure how it could get supported in EL7, since RPM 4.11 and Yum don't
support it. We'd be waiting for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10)
> > The Python 3 support is rather fresh and not well tested. Furthermore,
> > python3-bunch isn't available. I'll switch python3-rdopkg to provide rdopkg
> > a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ---
> The Python 3 support is rather fresh and not well tested. Furthermore,
> python3-bunch isn't available. I'll switch python3-rdopkg to provide rdopkg
> as soon as I'm confident in py3 support (in rdopkg a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8)
> Why does the Python 2 version "Provides: rdopkg = %{version}-%{release}"?
Because previously, the package was called just `rdopkg`, this is backward
compat.
> W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg/master/rdopkg.spec
SRPM URL: https://jruzicka.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rdopkg-0.45.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg/master/rdopkg.spec
SRPM URL: https://jruzicka.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rdopkg-0.45-0.fc25.src.rpm
Description: rdopkg is a tool for a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Bug 1246199 depends on bug 1264164, which changed state.
Bug 1264164 Summary: Review Request: python-rdoupdate - Manipulation and
validation of YAML update files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264164
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
I decided to split rdopkg into a framework and a tool, which will be quite a
big change so I'll probably wait with the Fedora inclusion until the split is
successful.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Jakub Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1264164
Flags|needinfo?(jr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jruzi...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #3 from hgue...@redhat.com ---
@Jakub: could you update the src,rpm too?
* drop the Group tag, unused now
* please switch to python versioned macros
* we need to review the python-rdoupdate package (same fixes should be applied
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Jakub Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1246192
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
rdopkg uses colors extensivly and many outputs are significantly less readable
without them so I'd leave it as hard dependency. I'll remove the comment :)
I plan to make rdopkg more modular in the future
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
Jakub Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hgue...@redhat.com
--
You are receiv
30 matches
Mail list logo