https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #39 from Dan Horák ---
Any tagging is not necessary, the build in ppc koji correctly landed in f24
tag, because bodhi is not in action yet for f24.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #38 from Vasant Hegde ---
> Dan,
>
> I've imported package and built it for F24 branch [1]. Can you please tag
> this to fedora 24?
>
> http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3172026
I did scratch build :-(
Did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #37 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
I've imported package and built it for F24 branch [1]. Can you please tag this
to fedora 24?
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3172026
-Vasant
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #36 from Vasant Hegde ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #35)
> Package request has been approved:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/opal-prd
Thanks!
I'm able to import initial package and build it.
-Vasant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/opal-prd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Vasant Hegde changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1312018
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #34 from Vasant Hegde ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #33)
> thanks, the package is APPROVED
Thanks Dan. I will raise "SCM admin request" to include this package.
-Vasant
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #33 from Dan H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #32 from Vasant Hegde ---
V7:
Changes in v7:
Fix opal-prd recompilation issse during install
Spec URL : https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v7/opal-prd.spec
SRPM :
https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v7/opal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #31 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
> looks good, but I have found that opal-prd is being recompiled in the
> %install section
>
> from the build.log
> ...
> Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.d4xSif
> + umask 022
> + cd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #30 from Vasant Hegde ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #28)
> (In reply to Vasant Hegde from comment #27)
> > Dan,
> >
> > >
> > > The systemd guideline links to
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> > > Defaul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #29 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to Vasant Hegde from comment #26)
> V6:
>
> Chnages:
> Added "Requires(post|preun|postun) tags"
>
> Spec URL : https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v6/opal-prd.spec
> SRPM :
> https://heg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #28 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to Vasant Hegde from comment #27)
> Dan,
>
> >
> > The systemd guideline links to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> > DefaultServices?rd=Starting_services_by_default for how to handl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #27 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
>
> The systemd guideline links to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> DefaultServices?rd=Starting_services_by_default for how to handle default
> state of services. But we can solve the d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #26 from Vasant Hegde ---
V6:
Chnages:
Added "Requires(post|preun|postun) tags"
Spec URL : https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v6/opal-prd.spec
SRPM :
https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v6/opal-prd-5.1.13-2.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #25 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
> > > - my scratch build =
> > > http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3077491
> > > - please update the scriptlets and Requires to the current style, see
> > > https://fedoraproject
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #24 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to Vasant Hegde from comment #23)
> V5:
> - Rebased to latest upstream version (v5.1.13)
> - Updated specfile to include pflash and scom tools in opal-utils package
> - Updated specfile to bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051573 (PPC64LETracker)
Referen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Vasant Hegde changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hegdevas...@in.ib |
|m.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hegdevas...@in.ibm.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #22 from IBM Bug Proxy ---
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2016-01-22 05:02 EDT---
(In reply to comment #5)
> sorry for the delay, but formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK*
> and BAD statuses below:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #21 from Dan Horák ---
sorry for the delay, but formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK*
and BAD statuses below:
OK source files match upstream:
080a0992dc4241ac0c8c2b7e556a20bbb45d068d skiboot-5.1.11.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugpr...@us.ibm.com
External Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #20 from Vasant Hegde ---
V4:
Addressed review comments from Dan.
Spec URL : https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v4/opal-prd.spec
SRPM :
https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v4/opal-prd-5.1.11-4.fc22.src.rpm
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #19 from Vasant Hegde ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #17)
> one more question - is the separation between opal-prd and opal-utils
> necessary?
opal-prd contains recovery and diagnostics daemon.. Needs to be installed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #18 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
Thanks for the review.
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #16)
> - distro-wide CFLAGS are not honoured in the build -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags
Added "%{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #17 from Dan Horák ---
one more question - is the separation between opal-prd and opal-utils
necessary? Won't be these 2 packages always both installed? Or is the daemon
accessible remotely?
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1224121
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #15 from Vasant Hegde ---
(In reply to Vasant Hegde from comment #14)
> v3:
>
> Spec URL : https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v3/opal-prd.spec
> SRPM :
> https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v3/opal-prd-5.1.11-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #14 from Vasant Hegde ---
v3:
Spec URL : https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v3/opal-prd.spec
SRPM :
https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v3/opal-prd-5.1.11-3.fc22.src.rpm
-Vasant
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Vasant Hegde changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1224121 |
--- Comment #13 from Vasant Hegde --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #12 from Vasant Hegde ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1224121
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #11 from Vasant Hegde ---
I ran fedora-review tool on this bugzilla and here is the output :
cat rpmlint.txt
Checking: opal-prd-5.1.11-2.fc22.ppc64.rpm
opal-utils-5.1.11-2.fc22.ppc64.rpm
opal-prd-5.1.11-2.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #10 from Vasant Hegde ---
V2 updated:
Spec URL: https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v2/opal-prd.spec
SRPM:
https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v2/opal-prd-5.1.11-2.fc22.src.rpm
-Vasant
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #9 from Vasant Hegde ---
Koji build : http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2930041
-Vasant
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #8 from Vasant Hegde ---
v2:
In v1, I missed to add systemd as Build Requirement. Hence build failed in
mock environment. I've fixed that issue and now I'm able to build rpm in mock
build environment.
Spec URL: https://hegdevasa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #7 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #5)
> %define kversion `uname -r`
> won't work in the buildsystem (or even just in mock), the kernel running is
> different from the installed kernel-devel package,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #6 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #5)
> %define kversion `uname -r`
> won't work in the buildsystem (or even just in mock), the kernel running is
> different from the installed kernel-devel package,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák ---
%define kversion `uname -r`
won't work in the buildsystem (or even just in mock), the kernel running is
different from the installed kernel-devel package, I think
KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/kernels/*
will work, but l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #4 from Vasant Hegde ---
rpmlint output :
rpmlint -v opal-prd-5.1.11-1.fc22.src.rpm
opal-prd.src: I: checking
opal-prd.src: I: checking-url http://github.com/open-power/skiboot (timeout 10
seconds)
opal-prd.src: I: checking-url
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #3 from Vasant Hegde ---
Spec URL: https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v1/opal-prd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://hegdevasant.fedorapeople.org/opal-prd/v1/opal-prd-5.1.11-1.fc22.src.rpm
-Vasant
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #1 from Vasant Hegde ---
I will build fedora package and post link here later this week.
-Vasant
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product a
46 matches
Mail list logo