[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-98716494c3 --- Comment #28 from Fedora

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-98716494c3 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- tarantool-1.6.8.530-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-220abf23ed -- You are receiving

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #26 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- > I think that `ExclusiveArch %{ix86} x86_64 armv7hl armv7hnl aarch64` is > suitable here. I think that's entirely reasonable. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #25 from Roman Tsisyk --- This package uses JIT compilation and fast cooperative multitasking in userspace (fibers) [1]. Currently native implementation (asm) of fibers only exists for the following

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Roman Tsisyk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||179260

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Roman Tsisyk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||238953

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/tarantool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Denis Fateyev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de...@fateyev.com

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #21 from Roman Tsisyk --- A new version. Spec URL: https://gist.github.com/rtsisyk/8a8d2dcae143d0699e76/raw/623b434534e369bd80cd282bb5ccd8c05ca3/tarantool.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #19 from Roman Tsisyk --- Status update: 1. I've been sponsored to packager group by Zbigniew. Thanks a lot for that. 2. New systemd scripts have been implemented as it was suggested - "preferrably replace

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #17 from Roman Tsisyk --- > %defattr(-,root,root,-) is unnecessary > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions]. OK, I hope it won't break RHEL/CentOS 6/7.

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- %defattr(-,root,root,-) is unnecessary [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions]. Requires: systemd-units →

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- (In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #17) > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) is unnecessary > >

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8.285-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #12 from Roman Tsisyk --- > $ rpmdev-bumpspec -V test.spec It works for me: VERSION=$(sed -n 's/^\([0-9\.]*\)-\([0-9]*\).*/\1\.\2/p' VERSION) rpmdev-bumpspec fedora.spec -n ${VERSION} -c "automated

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-0.284.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-0.282.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12380198

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #9 from Roman Tsisyk --- > Don't be so impatient, please? Sorry :) > Amazing. All that to end up with a very simple %version-%release, > How should the git-commands in the spec-file work from outside a git-repo

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt --- It is not needed to *manually* update spec files for simple updates, such as when replacing source tarballs. Tools like rpmdev-bumpspec handle several normal versioning schemes

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-0.282.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12380190

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jenslody's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-244.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12378907 --

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-0.282.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12374312

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Jens Lody changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@jenslody.de

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt --- Don't be so impatient, please? The Review Process depends on volunteers doing lots of work. There are hundreds of packages waiting to be reviewed: *

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #1 from Roman Tsisyk --- Any news? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 Roman Tsisyk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841