[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-07-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-07-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- man2html-1.6-8.g.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-18 03:41:47 EDT --- man2html-1.6-5.g.fc16 has been

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-18 03:39:08 EDT --- man2html-1.6-5.g.fc17 has been

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-18 03:47:58 EDT --- man2html-1.6-5.g.el6 has been

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-05-16 22:16:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). --

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #14 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-13 19:20:53 EDT --- This fixes everything mentioned

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #15 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-13 19:32:40 EDT --- I filed bug 821286 for proper

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2012-05-10 08:34:27 EDT --- So, here are a couple of findings not

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #12 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-10 21:34:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) So,

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #7 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-09 06:00:10 EDT --- Thanks for taking this! I've

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2012-05-09 13:00:06 EDT --- Agreed. iconv -f latin2 -t utf-8 for both

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #10 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-09 14:33:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) The

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-07 16:51:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) %setup

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #5 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2012-05-07 16:55:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) In order

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2012-05-07 17:21:22 EDT --- I recall a discussion on devel The

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2012-03-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2011-12-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 --- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com 2011-12-20 09:09:48 EST --- Sorry, the above Spec URL is

[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML

2011-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added