[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-07-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 --- Comment #10 from David Woodhouse --- I don't think I'd get too worked up about package naming. When the library is pulled in as a runtime dependency, it's referenced by the library name(s): libhogweed.so.2()(64bit) libnettle.so.4()(64bit)

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-07-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 David Woodhouse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||432228 --- Comment #8 from Michael Sc

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 --- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth --- Michael, thanks for the comments, but I have not posted a new spec yet due to the indecision on the package name. Fedora previously had this library as "nettle": https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/a

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt --- Just a brief look: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming As a precedent, Debian and openSUSE called it libnettle. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Review

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 --- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth --- (In reply to comment #4) > I like separating the devel packages so if you install one you don't > automatically pull in the other library. The only problem with splitting -devel packages is that the in

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 --- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 2. I know hogweed is a library and on some other distros library packages > > are always prefixed with lib, but as we don't have that convention in > > F

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 --- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth --- (In reply to comment #2) > 2. I know hogweed is a library and on some other distros library packages > are always prefixed with lib, but as we don't have that convention in > Fedora, would it not be bet

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 833573] Review Request: nettle - Low level crytopgraphic library

2012-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: libnettle - |Review Request: nettle -