Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
My apologies; I performed a pair of naive reviews of other packages, and was
hoping to reply once I had done something useful :-/. I am hoping to find time
next week to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #21 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
Ping, Jeremy?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #19 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
Thanks. I'll change the % in the change log and respin.
I did start reviewing another package that interested me - icaro. But then I
decided that would be too much
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #20 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Thanks. I'll change the % in the change log and respin.
I did start reviewing another package that interested me - icaro. But then
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #16 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
I've switched to hosting the binaries on fdo, and have a new build here:
Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~jwhite/spice-html5/spice-html5.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #17 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
the package looks good, I'll sponsor you, but I'll request something else
before, you can a informal review to another packager?
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #18 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
btw, please escape the character % in changelog, there should be no macros in
comments or in changelogs.
Example:
Revise the .spec file to use %%{name} (correct)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #15 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
Sorry for the slow reply; I don't have permission to write to the downloads
folder on the main spice project server, so I'm dependent on someone else to
push files for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #12 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Believe me, I very much want to kill the client-side bundled JS exception.
I hope to make it a Feature by F21 or so.
Unfortunately,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #13 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
T.C. Sorry, I meant, I don't dwell on this for now. ;) (my english yet is not
very polished)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Should Javascript package XXX be installed into /usr/share/js/XXX/, ala
php, pear et all? Or /usr/share/javascript? Or just
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #10 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Fedora does not require client-side JavaScript to be unbundled:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #11 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Believe me, I very much want to kill the client-side bundled JS exception. I
hope to make it a Feature by F21 or so.
Unfortunately, without clear JavaScript
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
I also recommend you take a look at this link, in order to get a willing
sponsor
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #5 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
You have a directory called thirdparthy, and this files come from these
projects,[4],[5] as well you indicate on the top of these files.
From my perspective I see
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
There are some mechanical challenges with linking Javascript libraries,
largely around path resolution and Apache configuration. Is
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
There are some mechanical challenges with linking Javascript libraries,
largely around path resolution and Apache
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy White jwh...@codeweavers.com ---
This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Jared Smith jsmith.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
25 matches
Mail list logo
