[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-11-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1010897

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- We don't apply a lib prefix to libraries. We prefer the upstream tarball or project name, which often means the src.rpm %name matches the tarball name. rpm -qf

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-10-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Hi all, before update this review, I want to know which name is better? clens(tarball name) or libclens(more like a library)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-07-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Hi Bjorn, what should I do now? Can I only package headers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Björn Esser from comment #1) There's only a static lib generated during %build, which isn't packaged at all. Please get in touch with upstream to have it build a shlib and

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- There's a hint in comment 1: | There's only a static lib generated during %build, | which isn't packaged at all. You cannot simply delete the compiled/built library in %install. You

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #4 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #3) There's a hint in comment 1: | There's only a static lib generated during %build, | which isn't packaged at all. You cannot simply

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- In fact this package is a base of assl: https://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/Agglomerated_SSL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe

[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

2013-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|