https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Bug 976793 depends on bug 1972445, which changed state.
Bug 1972445 Summary: Review Request: servus - Zeroconf discovery in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972445
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Otto Urpelainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Otto Urpelainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #26 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #25 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/lunchbox/lunchbox.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/lunchbox/lunchbox-1.17.0-2.fc33.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Otto Urpelainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #22 from Otto Urpelainen ---
Jaroslav,
Thank you for continuing this effort. For the tests, consider disabling only
the problematic test and let others run, either by patching of whatever
filtering option the test runner may have.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #21 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/lunchbox/lunchbox.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/lunchbox/lunchbox-1.17.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
I used lunchbox name with lowercase 'l' which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #20 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Tests temporary disabled due to:
https://github.com/Eyescale/Lunchbox/issues/330
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1972445
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Unfortunately upstream complicates it even more. Now it requires Servus (bug
1972445) and what's worse it's bundling it as a git submodule. I encouraged
upstream to add support for building with the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Otto Urpelainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||otu...@iki.fi
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
---
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Jaroslav Škarvada has canceled Package Review
's request for Jaroslav Škarvada
's needinfo:
Bug 976793: Review Request: libLunchbox - C++ library for multi-threaded
programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> I wondered why the upstream still has its own thread library, instead of
> using std::thread / boost::thread etc.
>
> And indeed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwak...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jskar...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Rest assured, it wouldn't be the first project to do that. Project name foo
releases library with SONAME libfoo.so.N in tarball libfoo with headers in
/usr/include/foo (#include
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2)
Thanks for the comments, I will try to go through them probably during next
week and provide new version.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
Reply from Stefan regarding the rename to libLunchbox:
Hi Jaroslav,
I've looked into Lunchbox vs. libLunchbox and came to the conclusion that
only the package name should change,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Lunchbox - |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
This will be non-trivial to review, and I dunno whether I will find enough time
this weekend to do everything. How deeply have you reviewed the package
already?
rpmlint tells:
31 matches
Mail list logo