27;s
>> something simple. If not, I'll try to pick it back up in a few days. I
>> apologize for the hacked CMakeLists to link against the library, I will fix
>> it to do it properly once everything else works!
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> --
, August 30, 2016 7:51 AM
To: Gallagher, Timothy P
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader
Thanks, Tim. I'll take a look in next few days.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P
mailto:tim.gallag...@gatech.edu>> wrote:
I have
everything else works!
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> *From:* ParaView on behalf of Gallagher,
> Timothy P
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 12:41 PM
>
> *To:* Utkarsh Ayachit
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Status of Bo
link against the library, I will fix it
to do it properly once everything else works!
Tim
From: ParaView on behalf of Gallagher, Timothy
P
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:41 PM
To: Utkarsh Ayachit
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of B
@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader
Tim,
Did you also add it to visit_readers.xml [1]? The proxy definition should also
have a section like so [2].
Utkarsh
[1]
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/visitbridge/blob/master/databases/visit_readers.xml
[2]
https://gi
the way.
Tim
From: Utkarsh Ayachit
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:17 PM
To: Gallagher, Timothy P
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader
Tim,
It doesn't know what the class is. Multiple things could have gone wrong:
ion or suggestions on debugging paraview? Is there a
> way to get more verbose output on why it isn't able to create the reader?
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
> Tim
>
> --
> *From:* Utkarsh Ayachit
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 8:46 AM
>
ml file, but that wasn't
> enough I guess.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> *From:* ParaView on behalf of Gallagher,
> Timothy P
> *Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2016 11:53 AM
> *To:* Utkarsh Ayachit
>
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *S
Ayachit
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader
Hi Utkarsh,
I just checked with the latest head of the git repo and when I compile with the
VisitBridge, there are no readers for BoxLib built.
This page lists it as supported:
http://www.paraview.or
de it:
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/VisIt_Database_Bridge
I have a dataset for you, I will send it off-list.
Thanks,
Tim
From: Utkarsh Ayachit
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 8:35 AM
To: Gallagher, Timothy P
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Stat
Tim,
I am not exactly sure what's the status of the reader, but I can
certainly look it up. Do you have a sample dataset also to test that
it's working (or not)?
Utkarsh
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Our code is moving away from traditional structured
Hi,
Our code is moving away from traditional structured grids towards an AMR
capability using BoxLib. That means, unfortunately, that all of the development
we have done to make our code Paraview and CoProcessing friendly is not usable
with the BoxLib file format.
I have seen some informatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
