The link to return to it from the "completed" page is (was) wrong. I was
surprised that it hadn't been mentioned before.
> On 29 February 2016 at 23:37 Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
> I've had a report that someone's unable to access the upload page.
> (Yes, someone's waited until the last *hour*
I would, but it appears I missed the deadline… Evidently the deadline was in
east coast time….
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>
> Hi Nicole: these are quite nice. Please consider submitting 3 to the PDML
> annual.
>
> Cheers, Christine
>
>
>
>> On Feb 29, 2016,
Thank you :-) I was rather unsure how the flowers from 8072 were going to turn
out with the lighting, but in the end I was pretty happy with it. Glad you
liked it!
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Wow, Nicole, there's some lovely work there! Your use of light and DOF is
And there I was expecting to see a magpie...
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:32 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> They come so close you feel they might knock your hat off …
>
> http://flic.kr/p/DHauHV
>
> enjoy!
> G
>
> The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to apprecia
So, it must looks very "vintage". ;)
Cheers,
Igor
PS. Ouch... I had a feeling something was not write. [sic!] ;)
Brian Walters Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:39:12 -0800 wrote:
Guilty as charged :-)>
I don't think I've dusted that 'sweat' collection since that photo was
taken - I should do that...
Hi Nicole: these are quite nice. Please consider submitting 3 to the PDML
annual.
Cheers, Christine
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 7:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Wow, Nicole, there's some lovely work there! Your use of light and DOF is
> unusual and very appealing.
>
> I particularly like 8456,
Guilty as charged :-)>
I don't think I've dusted that 'sweat' collection since that photo was
taken - I should do that...
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Igor PDML-St
Wow, Nicole, there's some lovely work there! Your use of light and DOF is
unusual and very appealing.
I particularly like 8456, 8072, 8203, and 8303.
Rick
On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:25 AM, Nicole Jacque wrote:
> I took a break from being Larry’s voice controlled light stand, and shot a
> few pict
While going through the photos for the PDML Annual, I bumped into a recent
snapshot taken during a conference trip at a restaurant [!] in Irkutsk,
Russia:
http://42graphy.org/misc/Cameras/USSR_Cameras_IR20825.jpg
All those cameras were produced in the former Soviet Union.
The restaurant had
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> After I uploaded my first image, I clicked on the "upload another image"
> button ( or something to that effect) on the confirmation screen... That led
> to an error page, link not found, or similar...
>
> I just went back to the link f
After I uploaded my first image, I clicked on the "upload another image" button
( or something to that effect) on the confirmation screen... That led to an
error page, link not found, or similar...
I just went back to the link from your email & it connected me without issue.
Just FYI.
-c
O
I've had a report that someone's unable to access the upload page.
(Yes, someone's waited until the last *hour* to send photos in.)
Anyone else unable to get it to load?
http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlbook/upload.php
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pe
Have to say I really didn't understand what Jack meant by "strong" so I
thought he was talking about the other ladybug shot :-)
ann
On 2/29/2016 3:55 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote:
Jack sent me his softened background version off-line, and the difference if
you look at the background is *very* subt
I just noticed that a couple of the bugs that have been annoying me in
lightroom seemed to have scuttled away, and that I must have upgraded to
lightroom 6.4 without realizing it. Just giving folks a heads up in
case they are still on 6.3
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Annal decisions, decisions...
[sic!]
I've just finalized those and submitted, with just over 3 hours to go..
There yee hav it matey,
Agh! :-)
Seeing at least 3 others who've submitted today, I am glad, I am not the
only indecisive procrastinator.
Agh!
I just fi
Annal decisions, decisions...
[sic!]
I've just finalized those and submitted, with just over 3 hours to go..
There yee hav it matey,
Agh!
:-)
Seeing at least 3 others who've submitted today, I am glad, I am not the
only indecisive procrastinator.
Agh!
IgoRrr
--
PDML Pentax-Di
Jack sent me his softened background version off-line, and the difference if
you look at the background is *very* subtle, (I had to put the two versions
side by side on my large work monitor) but it does seem to make the ladybug pop
quite pleasingly. It is amazing what such a subtle change can
If you look at the depth of field equations, they are based on whether
the circle of confusion is smaller than the size of the pixel. When you
look at an image on the web (generally about 2MP or below) the effective
dof is a lot greater than if you pixel peep the raw file (16-24 MP or
more), b
Nicole,
I received a quick query from Ann reflecting surprise at my "strong" (A little)
reaction to
your terrific Lady Bug Shot background.
Understand, it doesn't "need" softening, but it is something I would consider
were it mine.
I'll confess that I down loaded the image, but it will be removed
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:47 AM, John wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 9:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> Went on my first photo drive in months looking for some old buildings
>> and grave sites to add to my 4 seasons portfolio.
>>
>> Old school circa 1864
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=181939
No!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 10:10 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> there are two ladybug shots... I wonder if Jack meant the other one..
> I thought the background was just dandy -
> Jack -are you looking at the photo on your phone?
>
> ann
>
>
>> On 2/29/2016 1:04 PM, Nicole
Thank you. It was my first attempt with a macro, I’m looking forward to
experimenting more :-)
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:31 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I particularly like this ladybug :-) the placement of her in the frameand the
> good bokeh.. - very nice
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/alway
I know that several on the list enjoy photos of yard birds, and so I
thought I would pass along this neat idea for building a portable
reflecting pool to transform your garden bird photography.
It is on page 26 of this online magazine:
https://issuu.com/photation/docs/wildlight01_spring_2015
Hope
there are two ladybug shots... I wonder if Jack meant the other one..
I thought the background was just dandy -
Jack -are you looking at the photo on your phone?
ann
On 2/29/2016 1:04 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote:
Hmm, I might be able to soften that up a bit in Lightroom. I’ll play with it
and se
Hmm, I might be able to soften that up a bit in Lightroom. I’ll play with it
and see how it looks.
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:46 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Like Lady Bug very much although background somewhat strong.
>
> J
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ann sanfedele"
> To: "Pentax-D
ann sanfedele wrote:
>On 2/29/2016 11:37 AM, John wrote:
>> Oh. That's too bad.
>>
>> I've occasionally found it a useful tool down here in the boonies.
>>
>It's just too scary hereand lots of scammign going on too
Craig's List? In New York City?
Nope. Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nop
It's just too scary hereand lots of scammign going on too
ann
On 2/29/2016 11:37 AM, John wrote:
Oh. That's too bad.
I've occasionally found it a useful tool down here in the boonies.
On 2/28/2016 4:48 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
John
no way - not where I live
ann
On 2/28/2016 2:22 PM, John wr
On 2/29/2016 9:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Went on my first photo drive in months looking for some old buildings
and grave sites to add to my 4 seasons portfolio.
Old school circa 1864
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18193903
MachPelah cemetery, not far from the school
http://photo.net
Oh. That's too bad.
I've occasionally found it a useful tool down here in the boonies.
On 2/28/2016 4:48 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
John
no way - not where I live
ann
On 2/28/2016 2:22 PM, John wrote:
Maybe don't forget to look on Craig's List.
On 2/28/2016 1:17 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Paul
Beautiful post, Frank!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 8:08 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> well done
>
> Dave
>
>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:45 PM, knarf wrote:
>> He shows up every year. Same costume. Same smile on his face.
>>
>> Made the finals (as he always does) and I think
well done
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:45 PM, knarf wrote:
> He shows up every year. Same costume. Same smile on his face.
>
> Made the finals (as he always does) and I think he ended up 4th. He's fast as
> hell on pavement but ice just doesn't agree with him:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogsp
very nice
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I’m getting around pretty well now, and i had hoped to shoot some birds from
> the deck with temps hitting the upper 50s. But brisk winds kept them in
> hiding. I eventually gave up and wandered around the house a bit with
Typically nice composition. Well timed plane placement.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
To: "PAW Picture-A-Week project" , "PDML" ,
"SeePhoto Talk" , "BAPhotoShooters BAPA"
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 7:32:56 AM
Subject: PESO 2016 - 051 - GDG
They come so close yo
very nic
Dave
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
> They come so close you feel they might knock your hat off …
>
>http://flic.kr/p/DHauHV
>
> enjoy!
> G
>
> The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> They come so close you feel they might knock your hat off …
>
>http://flic.kr/p/DHauHV
>
> enjoy!
> G
Indeed, I do enjoy these pictures you post.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRI
They come so close you feel they might knock your hat off …
http://flic.kr/p/DHauHV
enjoy!
G
The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Went on my first photo drive in months looking for some old buildings
and grave sites to add to my 4 seasons portfolio.
Old school circa 1864
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18193903
MachPelah cemetery, not far from the school
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18193904
http://photo.
Like "Light" a lot!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 8:57:16 PM
Subject: Re: Boris PESO x3 (repost)
Thanks, Larry...
I literally went "wow" when I turned around I saw this light.
Boris
On 2/28/2016 21:15, L
Like Lady Bug very much although background somewhat strong.
J
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 5:31:28 AM
Subject: Re: PESO from a GESO -- flowers
I particularly like this ladybug :-) the placement of her in the
I particularly like this ladybug :-) the placement of her in the
frameand the good bokeh.. - very nice
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alwaysapex/24736175884/in/album-72157665050310752/
and the shamrocks..but all the flowers are nicely composed and exposed -
just some are a bit too
soft for my tas
G'day all
I'll be closing submissions on Wednesday evening (Sydney time). Better
rush out and grab a shot before it's too late...
Theme: Rush Hour
As usual submit here:
http://pug.komkon.org/submit/
Full Submission Guidelines here:
http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
Cheers
Brian
41 matches
Mail list logo