EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of
> film -- and an unfortunate incident)
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: Peifer, William
> Subject: RE: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on
> inspection of f
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William
Subject: RE: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on
inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident)
> Bill Robb wrote:
> [Everything I always wanted to know about APS processors, and
more.
> Snipped]
>
> Hi Bill,
- Original Message -
From: Geoffgo
Subject: Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on
inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident)
> OTOH, some of the attitudes expressed toward film customers
can only
> accelerate the adoption of digital.
Sure, and these same moron
OTOH, some of the attitudes expressed toward film customers can only
accelerate the adoption of digital.
Geoff 8:^)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of
film -- and an unfortunate incident)
. However, your assumption ab
Bill Robb wrote:
[Everything I always wanted to know about APS processors, and more.
Snipped]
Hi Bill,
Gee, I get the feeling that some of those APS customers really get in your
shorts ;-) HAR!!
Seriously, thanks very much for your detailed note. Kodak's decision (or
whoever's, since
Hi again folks,
Again, many thanks for your replies on x-ray fogging, APS film cartridge
construction, and visible (to the consumer) differences between exposed and
unexposed APS cartridges. Once again, I've learned something new thanks to
the collective wisdom and experience of the PDMLers. A
On 2 Jul 2002 at 7:23, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Bill - everything I've read says NOT, repeat, NOT to carry your film through the
> metal detectors. You are more likely to have your film suffer damage that way.
> And do NOT pack film in a check-in bag. The safest inspection is by hand, but
> the chec
On 2 Jul 2002 at 7:43, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> Of course this does bring up an additional question. Is it generally the
> case that the APS mini-lab processing machine cannot tell the difference
> between an exposed and an unexposed roll?
The APS cartridge provides a visual indicator
9 matches
Mail list logo
