Another attempt to demonize photographers

I find this very depressing: http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

Our very own Taliban in the Department of Justice. Rick --- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I find this very depressing: > > http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html > > Bob > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

Be sure to click on the Google and Archive.org links on the first page to see the actual "pornographic" photos. http://images.google.com/images?q=%22webe%20web%22 http://web.archive.org/web/20050411170128/www.bsmmodeling.com/115.html This ought to be one big joke, but I'm sure nobody in the

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

If they really want to target child exploitation, how about starting the the "kiddie beauty pageants" -P Rick Womer wrote: > Our very own Taliban in the Department of Justice. > > Rick > > --- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I find this very depressing: >> >> http://news.com.com/210

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

On 2/12/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed: >I find this very depressing: > >http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html If you're going to play with fire, you've got to expect to get burned now and again. Seems harsh, but along with extremes of liberalism there are equally prudish conser

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

ditto :( ann Bob Shell wrote: >I find this very depressing: > >http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html > >Bob > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

Taking this a bit further... Does this mean that Britney Spears' 1999 music video for "Baby One More Time" is pornographic? Wasn't she 17 (a minor) when that video was shot? Are the director and crew of that video, a montage of dance in a high school with Spears dressed in a provocative school gir

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote: > If they really want to target child exploitation, how about > starting the > the "kiddie beauty pageants" Yep. Here are some of the photos they busted this guy for shooting: http://images.google.com/images?q=%22webe+web% 22&svnum=10&hl=en&l

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

I thought you must be ... (oh I can't say it. it's just too easy). Cotty wrote: > On 2/12/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> I find this very depressing: >> >> http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html >> > > If you're going to play with fire, you've got to expect to get

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

In the US, in fact I'd say North America generally, the phrase "for the children" , seems to have become magic words to use to trample liberties, pass and enforce laws of dubious merit, and extract money from peoples wallets and bank accounts with little or no anesthesia, not matter the what th

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

- Original Message - From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers > In the US, in fact I'd say North America generally, the phrase "for > the > children" , seems to have become magic words to use to trample > libert

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

William Robb wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "P. J. Alling" > Subject: Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers > > >> In the US, in fact I'd say North America generally, the phrase "for >> the >> children" , seems

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > Actually we do have a first ammendment equivalent, however there is > one > exception in ours, 'Hate Speech', which is sadly a constitutional > exception. So I can't say "I hate people who hate others" if I move to Canada? Bob -- PDML Pentax-

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

Bob Shell wrote: > On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > >> Actually we do have a first ammendment equivalent, however there is >> one >> exception in ours, 'Hate Speech', which is sadly a constitutional >> exception. > > So I can't say "I hate people who hate others" if I move to Ca

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

That's outrageous. I'm going to write my congressman. I'm fairly conservative on most issues, but this is ludicrous. Why don't they go after real child pornographers? I can't believe it. We should all respond to this. Paul On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Bob Shell wrote: > I find this very depre