Probably not any cheaper.
At 01:18 PM 3/10/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Here's an interesting question. Suppose that Pentax made a brand new
K1000, metal body and all> What would they have to charge for such a
beast? Could it be made much cheaper than the Nikon FMA3?
Steven Desjardins
Department of C
It would be better to use the FM2n, since that was in production for a
long time with a price history. I would not be surprised if the price
ratio difference between the K1000 and FM/FM2n was pretty constant over
time. When the FM2n stopped being sold last year it sold for $400-$500.
The K1000
Or take the features of the ZX-M and put it in the K1000 metal body, now
that would be a very attractive camera to me. The ZX-M has been compared as
the K1000 replacement.
> Here's an interesting question. Suppose that Pentax made a brand new
> K1000, metal body and all> What would they have to
Here's an interesting question. Suppose that Pentax made a brand new
K1000, metal body and all> What would they have to charge for such a
beast? Could it be made much cheaper than the Nikon FMA3?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540)
4 matches
Mail list logo