On Wednesday, January 9, 2002, at 08:58 PM, Paul Jones wrote:
> I'm pretty sure a Kodak Disk camera was my first camera, had a beautfil
> anodized brass look on the front. I actualy found it a couple of weeks
> back
> with a half exposed role (sorry disc) in it. Fat chance of getting that
> dev
ang Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:52:49 -0800 (PST)
> To: Pentax-Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Kodak: a company shoots its own foot
>
> Speaking of Kodak, I think it's pretty rare to see a company
> tha
; From: Tonghang Zhou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 January 2002 22:53
> To: Pentax-Discuss
> Subject: Kodak: a company shoots its own foot
>
>
> Speaking of Kodak, I think it's pretty rare to see a company
> that throughout the years has been doing all it
>They sell film, and yet every few years they come up and some
stupid (IMHO) contraptions to make film photography less and less
interesting to the mass population.
Well, while I agree with some of your statements I think you misread what Kodak is all
about.
Kodak was, at its very inception, a
Hey, you're forgetting the 1970's sensational Disc Camera!
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 110, APS, and the $10 disposable cameras. Look how popular they
> are these days, and how bad the results are.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdm
Tonghang,
Perhaps they have been working hand in hand with the Pentax marketing
department. :-)
Bruce Dayton
Tuesday, January 08, 2002, 2:52:49 PM, you wrote:
TZ> Speaking of Kodak, I think it's pretty rare to see a company
TZ> that throughout the years has been doing all it can to destroy
Speaking of Kodak, I think it's pretty rare to see a company
that throughout the years has been doing all it can to destroy
its own baseline business.
They sell film, and yet every few years they come up and some
stupid (IMHO) contraptions to make film photography less and less
interesting to the
7 matches
Mail list logo
