age-
>From: Frantisek Vlcek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 8:06 AM
>To: HUDERER Bernd
>Subject: Re: LX Ni-Cd Battery Pack
>
>
>Wednesday, May 29, 2002, 2:27:51 PM, HUDERER wrote:
>HB> Bob S. wrote:
>
>>> I changed the cells over a y
Wednesday, May 29, 2002, 2:27:51 PM, HUDERER wrote:
HB> Bob S. wrote:
>> I changed the cells over a year ago and just followed Rob's
>> parts list,
>> ordering Sanyo's like he used. I got the right battery just
>> fine. They are
>> a tight fit with little need for foam padding below them.
The 1/3 AA's are a little smaller than the 1/3A's but they are rated
at 110 mAh consistent with the original batteries and ni-cd batteries
don't mind delivering a lot of current. We'll see how they do in the long
run but for now things seem to work fine.
Len.
On Mon, 27 May 2002 [EMAIL P
Len Zedel wrote:
> Problem: Batteries inside were not 1/3 AA but rather 1/3 A! (Careful
> reading would have revealed this fact). This subtle
> distinction was lost
> on me after the thread of ni-cd versus ni-mh of a couple of weeks ago
> through which I was sure reference was made to 1/3AA.
By friday last I had received both the battery pack that I had bartered
for with Andre and the Ni-Cd batteries that I had ordered from DigiKey.
Armed with Rob Studdert's instructions I tore into the battery pack and
found things pretty much as described except:
Problem: Batteries inside were not
5 matches
Mail list logo