On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Going to the site you posted, I got this:
>
>The area you wish to access is behind registration.
Oh! I'm not registered either, I don't think? I certainly didn't log on
and I haven't a clue what my username and password might be if I was.
> Oh
could well become my Point and Shoot of choice, if the price is under
US$1000.00
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
> -Original Message-
> From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
> > pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
> > same size as the old 5mp sensor and it shows in the quality of the
> > photographs.
> >
> > http://www.dprev
on 11/20/03 10:15 PM, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where have you seen sample pics? Can you provide a URL? The dpreview
> preview had no photos ... oops, images.
Someone posted first sample from his just-bought F828.
http://www.pbase.com/image/23462004&exif=Y
Much better, than pr
JCO, so do you see we can agree?
I'm fully with you on this topic.
Dario (yawn) Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP
8.
Dario (very critical this late evening) Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
> Yep ... the F828
Where have you seen sample pics? Can you provide a URL? The dpreview
preview had no photos ... oops, images.
>
>
> They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
> pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
> same size as the old 5mp sensor and it s
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
> was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
> with 8Mpixel sensor!
They do. All of the sample photographs r
Yep ... the F828 ... should be v-e-r-r-r-y interesting to see how well it
works. Its predecessors, the F717, was very highly regarded.
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
> was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
> with 8Mpixel sensor!
>
> Looks like 6Mpix
id of one of the main advantages of digital vs. film. Silly, very very
silly.
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: "alex wetmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation w
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
> was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
> with 8Mpixel sensor!
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
sa
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A convers
Hi Chris,
Going to the site you posted, I got this:
The area you wish to access is behind registration.
If you are an existing user of Times Online please enter you Username
and Password on the spaces provided below on the right.
If you are new to Times Onlin
I have no opinion WRT the quality of CDs versus LPs, but I thought the
following link from the UK Sunday Times 'Style' magazine might be timely?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2104-882918,00.html
There is a large picture to accompany the words in the actual paper
magazine. Perhaps low-e
on 20.11.03 1:13, J. C. O'Connell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
> ($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
> both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
> crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
> cost about 20K including
on 19.11.03 18:13, Paul Eriksson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sorry but I can't agree with that a good quality record player in a good
> stereo system a cd can't touch a LP much less a high quality pressed LP.
It's all relative. There are some audio qualities on LPs played on thousends
$
i have and i know. you pull this on the Naktalk mailing list too.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:40 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
> Each to their own. Well executed double blind audio testing often
9:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
>
> > I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
> > ($29K lou
--- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
> Each to their own. Well executed double blind audio testing often leads to
> frac
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
>
> > I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
> > ($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
> > both analog and CD. On his system,
On 19 Nov 2003 at 19:13, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
> ($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
> both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
> crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
> cost about 20K including upsamplers, j
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
cost about 20K including upsamplers, jitterboxes,
etc. His phono rig is a
l.com
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
On 19 Nov 2003 at 18:19, J. C. O'Con
On 19 Nov 2003 at 18:19, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Wrong, there are tons of new models of turntables
> coming out and also tons of ultra high quality
> reissue LPs. The high end audio market has spoken
> and the winner IS NOT CD. CDs are a mass market
> mid fi product to be played on crappy $300 co
07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Eriksson"
Subject: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
>
>
>
> Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> >Yes, but at the start CDs offe
Hi,
> This is surely a moot point. It is well nigh impossible to buy new LP
> records and the equipment needed to play them. The reason is because the
> marketplace has spoken, and the LP is out.
> At the moment, the marketplace is talking about film vs. digital. As soon as
> film loses, it's gone
>
>
>
>
> Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> >Yes, but at the start CDs offered better quality than longplays.
>
> I'm sorry but I can't agree with that a good quality record player in a good
> stereo system a cd can't touch a LP much less a high quality pressed LP.
Sure. As long as you're young e
28 matches
Mail list logo
