Hello Peter,
I only have a ZX-10 to compare with. The sound of the *ist is louder
than the ZX-10. It is a much more confident sound (solid - less
cheesy), but is louder. If stealth is important, the ZX-10 is the
better choice (lot less features). I can't really say how loud the
ZX-10 is compar
Hello Pieter,
We were talking about the FILM *IST - not the DIGITAL *IST D. The
film *ist is a very inexpensive camera targeted more at first time
users who are going to buy the FAJ zooms.
My point was, that the people who complain about the lack of support
of older lenses (people who have the l
Perhaps the "K challenged mount" would suffice.
Bruce
Thursday, January 1, 2004, 10:48:56 AM, you wrote:
ft> You're right, John,
ft> We should call it a "differently-abled mount". Or maybe a "special mount".
ft> I'm starting to feel better about it already...
ft>
ft> -frank (on his lawy
I don't think that it is targeted at all those who still have pre 'A'
lenses. Those people generally like the LX, MX, SuperProgram era
bodies as well as the lenses. They might be enticed by the MZ-S (much more
the same style in handling and feel), but certainly not enough of them
would go for an
I bought a film *ist as a backup to my *istD. Overall, it is quite
nice and has enough features. Pretty usable overall. Certainly not
an MZ-S by any stretch of the imagination, but at 1/3 cost, there are
not very many features on the MZ-S that it is lacking.
My daughter has been "testing" it fo
5 matches
Mail list logo