Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread John Sessoms
Ya'll may have noticed I don't post any images. That's 'cause I don't have any place to post 'em. I'd like some suggestions on which service I might go with ... some pros & cons - cost, available space, ease of use, etc. Also, any thoughts you might wish to share on preparing images for postin

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread Scott Loveless
John Sessoms wrote: > Ya'll may have noticed I don't post any images. > > That's 'cause I don't have any place to post 'em. I'd like some > suggestions on which service I might go with ... some pros & cons - > cost, available space, ease of use, etc. > > Also, any thoughts you might wish to sha

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread pnstenquist
I like photo.net. I've been on there for quite a few years. It's faster than most services, easy to use and heavily populated. Thus, you can get a lot of feedback if you so desire. It's $25 a year for unlimited uploads. You can also upload witout paying a fee, but your photos will remain on only

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread Walter Hamler
http://photobucket.com/ I have been happy with them and probably considered a very low use customer. Walt On 11/1/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ya'll may have noticed I don't post any images. > > That's 'cause I don't have any place to post 'em. I'd like some > suggestions on whic

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread Paul Sorenson
Your Roadrunner subscription comes w/5mb of personal web space. You can use that to get you started while you decide if you want to subscribe to a service like Picasa, photo.net, Flickr, etc. You can get more info here... http://www.timewarnercable.com/NC/products/RoadRunner/Features.html -p

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! I find that http://not.contaxg.com/ is very convenient service in all respects. And it is free of charge. Boris John Sessoms wrote: > Ya'll may have noticed I don't post any images. > > That's 'cause I don't have any place to post 'em. I'd like some > suggestions on which service I might

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread P. J. Alling
I've always sort of wondered, if it's "not contex g" does that mean that if you use one you're not allowed to post there? Boris Liberman wrote: > Hi! > > I find that http://not.contaxg.com/ is very convenient service in all > respects. And it is free of charge. > > Boris > > John Sessoms wrote:

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread John Sessoms
From: Scott Loveless > John Sessoms wrote: >> >> In the longer term, I plan to create my own website. This is to be >> for a photography business - weddings & portraiture most likely, >> with some fine art. >> > I really think you need to use something other than a free photo > hosting site for

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread John Sessoms
From: Paul Sorenson > Your Roadrunner subscription comes w/5mb of personal web space. You > can use that to get you started while you decide if you want to > subscribe to a service like Picasa, photo.net, Flickr, etc. You can > get more info here... > > http://www.timewarnercable.com/NC/product

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-01 Thread Boris Liberman
Peter, since Pentax is not Contax I am allowed to post there. I suppose you too ;-). Boris P. J. Alling wrote: > I've always sort of wondered, if it's "not contex g" does that mean that > if you use one you're not allowed to post there? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://p

Re: Web Hosting and Image Posting

2007-11-02 Thread Bob Sullivan
John, I did a web page a 3 or 4 years ago and still have it with my free AOL space, but I've been using Picasa for the past 18 months for snapshots. http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan It's all free and easy to send folks the URL. (You might note, I posted some of the photos on a trip to Au