On Tuesday, Oct 28, 2003, at 23:48 Europe/London, Michael G Schwern
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:17:24PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
This may be a dim question but why scan blib and lib?
[snip]
my $blib = File::Spec->catfile(qw(blib lib));
[snip]
That's not blib and lib, that's a cross p
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:17:24PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
> This may be a dim question but why scan blib and lib?
>
> [snip]
> >my $blib = File::Spec->catfile(qw(blib lib));
> [snip]
That's not blib and lib, that's a cross platform way of saying:
my $blib = 'blib/lib';
> Wouldn't ever
On Friday, Oct 24, 2003, at 14:23 Europe/London, Andrew Savige wrote:
I'm about to add a POD test program to my phalanx distro.
Before I do that, just want to check I'm using the best model.
I plan on using the one from WWW::Mechanize (shown below) --
unless someone can suggest a better model.
[sn
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 12:25:45PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Your version does not work (unless I've had a brain malfunction):
No, I had the brain malfunction. I forgot that and has an even lower
precedence than = so the expression comes out as:
(my $have_testpod = !$@) and $Test::Pod::V
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 04:45:48PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
>> There is a misprint in this line:
>>my $have_testpod = !$@ and $Test::Pod::VERSION >= 0.95;
>> It should read:
>>my $have_testpod = !$@ && $Test::Pod::VERSION >= 0.95;
>
> I deliberately used and i
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 04:45:48PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > Since skip_all will exit immediately you can fold that big "everything
> > inside the else block" away.
> >
> > eval 'use Test::Pod';
> > my $have_testpod = !$@ and $Test::Pod::VERSION >= 0.95;
> > plan s
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Since skip_all will exit immediately you can fold that big "everything
> inside the else block" away.
>
> eval 'use Test::Pod';
> my $have_testpod = !$@ and $Test::Pod::VERSION >= 0.95;
> plan skip_all => "Test::Pod v0.95 required for testing POD"
> unless $have_tes
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:23:52PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
> such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?
Probably not worth the inevitable argument.
> use Test::More;
>
> use File::Spec;
> use File::Find;
> use strict;
>
>
> Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
> such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?
Personally, I'd just as soon not have it be one of the numeric ones. It
doesn't matter what order it's run in.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:pet
I'm about to add a POD test program to my phalanx distro.
Before I do that, just want to check I'm using the best model.
I plan on using the one from WWW::Mechanize (shown below) --
unless someone can suggest a better model.
Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
such a beast:
10 matches
Mail list logo