On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 08:37 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:21:38PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
At YAPC::Europe there was some discussion about Test::Builder->level,
$Test::Builder::Level and the fact that they don't really work well as
implemented. I kno
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:54:44 +, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> The problem there is the case where you want to override behaviors but still
> keep state between the two objects. So things like the test counter and
> test details would have to be preserved. I guess this is what chromatic was
> ta
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:04:53PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
> O! Just had an idea prompted by reset(). How about having
>
> $builder->push_state;
> $builder->pop_state;
>
> that would store and restore the complete state of the builder object
> in a stack? Would make it easier
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:21:38PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
> >At YAPC::Europe there was some discussion about Test::Builder->level,
> >$Test::Builder::Level and the fact that they don't really work well as
> >implemented. I know we reached some sort of consensus about how to do it
> >better, b
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 04:10 am, Michael G Schwern wrote:
At YAPC::Europe there was some discussion about Test::Builder->level,
$Test::Builder::Level and the fact that they don't really work well as
implemented. I know we reached some sort of consensus about how to do it
better, but
